On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >
> >> From: Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com>
> >> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> >> Cc:
> >> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:01 PM
> >> Subject: Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report
> (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>  It is good that someone finally explained their opinion of
> >>>  a mentor's responsibility to the IPMC out in the open.  Let
> >>>  me disagree with you that mentors are not supposed to be put
> >>>  in the position of judging whether or not a podling is actually
> >>>  making progress or not.  If mentors don't do that, who does?
> >>>  The chair?  A super-committee?  Nobody?
> >>
> >> Last time I looked, the board charge the IPMC with this duty, not
> Mentors
> >
> > Last time I looked, mentors were delegated this duty by the IPMC.
> > If not, let's go ahead and do that just to add clarity.
>
> Project PMCs are not allowed to delegate oversight without board permission
>

What Joe is trying to say, AFAIU, is that IPMC is represented here by
mentors, and that is the core role of a Mentor, at least if understand that
correctly.


>
> Robert
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour
----
"Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving"
- Albert Einstein

Reply via email to