On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> Cc: >> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:11 PM >> Subject: Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: >> Small but otherwise happy podlings)] >> >> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> >> wrote: >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> >>>> From: Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> >>>> To: general@incubator.apache.org >>>> Cc: >>>> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:01 PM >>>> Subject: Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report >> (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)] >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Joe Schaefer >> <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> It is good that someone finally explained their opinion of >>>>> a mentor's responsibility to the IPMC out in the open. Let >>>>> me disagree with you that mentors are not supposed to be put >>>>> in the position of judging whether or not a podling is actually >>>>> making progress or not. If mentors don't do that, who does? >>>>> The chair? A super-committee? Nobody? >>>> >>>> Last time I looked, the board charge the IPMC with this duty, not >> Mentors >>> >>> Last time I looked, mentors were delegated this duty by the IPMC. >>> If not, let's go ahead and do that just to add clarity. >> >> Project PMCs are not allowed to delegate oversight without board permission > > There you go again Robert, making up rules about corporate governance > that have no basis in reality.
This is why the Members asked the Board to break up Jakarta Robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
