William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>> Any official IPMC vote should occur on and be archived at one of
>>> its two lists, private@ (for people-stuff) or general@, AFAICT.
>> Personally, I would prefer to have these votes on general@, but Geir
>> expressed his reasons in the absence of a rule to that effect.
>> And all of the lists belong to the Incubator PMC, right?
> there's no g'damned way I'm grepping through 90+ lists to find
> IPMC vote history :)
Agreed. :-) Hence one of the reasons for my preference.
> > Jakarta doesn't hold all of its votes on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > So one can argue the point both ways.
> Uhm - well, no, since this isn't Jakarta :)
Just showing that Geir had a basis, as he explained.
> > Unless you feel that this is a procedural issue strong enough
> > to invalidate the vote, let's deal with it separately.
> You are the chairman... it's your call and yours alone ;-P
Bah.
If we want to require that these votes be held on general@, that is fine with
me. My point was that unless someone feels strongly about it, let's not
disrupt the vote for Harmony.
> If the whole idea is for projects to learn the process of making consensus
> decisions or the closest approximation available, then by all means the PMC's
> vote needs to happen on the PMC list.
To be clear, most votes should be on a public list, not a private list.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
