On Dec 30, 2005, at 9:50 AM, Brett Porter wrote:

On 12/31/05, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think it was just coming out of incubation, but yes, that's something
we should point to somehow.

I agree. This point actually raises something else - it would be a bit
silly to have a specs project ("here are all our Java specs!") if it
doesn't have them all ("...except this one, this one, and this one").

Is it worth asking them to move too, and do we need to make sure they
all agree first, or do we just agree to link out to them?

Once it's in an easily-obtained and well-advertised download location does it matter where the jdo-spec jar is built? There is a good reason to build the jdo-spec jar as part of the project (it's a dependency of the other sub-projects in Apache JDO). 

I understand the earlier point that there might not be a lot of coding
going on here and that might hinder building any community around it.
However, its another excuse for a bunch of people doing Java stuff to
get together in one place, and maybe meet a wider community of people
at Apache. That can only be a good thing.

It would be nice to have a JDO2 impl here as well...

Getting off-topic, but does that really need to be here? Is there
anything stopping people from getting involved in jpox, who as I
understand it work very closely with the jdo team here and are the RI?

The JPOX folks who provide the JDO 2 RI are also committers on the Apache JDO project. Not the reverse, but there's no stopping Apache JDO folks from joining the JPOX project.

Craig

- Brett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Craig Russell

Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo

408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to