Henri Yandell wrote:
On 12/30/05, Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/30/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Reasons for not Jakarta:
*) Java specific.
I wonder why it has to be Java-specific ? Aren't there any standards
that contains bindings for several languages ?
Good point. I originally meant that if we wanted specs from other
languages to be there, Jakarta wouldn't make sense. However for
something like SAX or DOM, it's less about another language spec and
more about a cross-language spec.
Well, there is Tuscany's SCA and SDO, which are language neutral,
although I don't know if there are meaningful artifacts for other
languages like API jars for JSRs. I guess there are header files and
such....
geir
No idea to be honest. If we go with Jakarta or JCP as a location; I
think we just treat them as exceptions to be dealt with.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
