On 12/30/05, Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/30/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Reasons for not Jakarta: > > > > *) Java specific. > > > I wonder why it has to be Java-specific ? Aren't there any standards > that contains bindings for several languages ?
Good point. I originally meant that if we wanted specs from other languages to be there, Jakarta wouldn't make sense. However for something like SAX or DOM, it's less about another language spec and more about a cross-language spec. No idea to be honest. If we go with Jakarta or JCP as a location; I think we just treat them as exceptions to be dealt with. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
