I asked Sam Ruby about this and he said something to the effect of without clarification would you want to leave it up to twelve random people?
He does have a point. Look at section 6 in the LGPL.. thats the main part in dispute.
So lets say IBM included Tapestry in Websphere.. Yes they can release it under whatever license they want, but do they have to release their source?
-Andy
See, that's the part I don't get. I know this is tedious if you've been through this, but I don't see how the LGPL is viral (the GPL is definitely viral, by design). If all you are doing is restributing an LGPL package without modification, I just don't see how it affects your license. As I understand it, the LGPL and the ASL are pretty much the same, until you modify and redistribute.
-- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components http://jakarta.apache.org/proposals/tapestry
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
