I think Incubator is very fine for defining, refining and formalizing a general Apache Incubation
process, which then should be applied by the various Apache top-level projects, because else
you might end up with "Baby-Apaches" (but I guess this might be not just because there are different opinions on the incubation process, but other stuff as well).


But I think Jeff has a point. For instance in the case of Lenya, discussions quickly moved to cocoon-dev, because we
proposed Lenya as a Cocoon subproject, and hence the Cocoon community cared about it.


Thanks

Michael



Paul Hammant wrote:

Jeff,

There is more than just Tapestry in incubator.

- Paul

--- Jeff Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Feh.


Incubation was a dumb idea from the start.  It is busy failing in
practice.

PMCs should manage the acceptance of new subprojects, not some
disinterested Incubator PMC.

IMHO, scrap this failed experiment and let Tapestry migrate to Jakarta
without being further jerked around.

I feel I'm stating the blindingly obvious. Is it just me?


--Jeff


On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 06:58:22PM -0500, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:


How, exactly, is Tapestry ever expected to exit the proposal stage?

Despite repeated attempts, Tapestry is NOT in BugZilla.  We're still forced
to use SourceForge for bug tracking.

Tapestry's mailing lists are not getting archived any more (not since 2/21).

Nobody seems to know ANY of the procedures for getting things done.  Nothing
is documented.  Simple things like the correct way to distribute a release
(including signing and mirroring) are just "known" by the right people ...
and I don't even know who is in the know.

Andrew and Dion have been helpful, both before the move and after.

The only other accomplishment of the incubation process has been a code
audit that resulted in a shuffling of the libraries checked into CVS and
distributed with the framework.

Jakarta infrastructure is non-existent. Worse, the Jakarta culture
erroneously expects things to get done based on e-mails, rather than
something organized, like using BugZilla to track infrastructure requests.


The Incubator team has yet to provide a time table or a check list to
indicate what the exit criteria are.  In terms of Tapestry's commitments to
the Incubator, it looks like we're more than there (based on
http://incubator.apache.org/process.html).  In terms of Incubator's
commitments to Tapestry ... that is, to assist Tapestry in moving into
Jakarta, fitting in, and accessing infrastructure; very little has been
accomplished.

--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
http://jakarta.apache.org/proposals/tapestry


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]







--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to