On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 03:05 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Once both of those are resolved I'll change that to a +1 not before. While I agree that the incubator in its current form has been a wasteful excercise. The incubation period itself proved useful in that it exposed issues that I was not aware of (regarding GPL jars used in example code).
I'm torn, I consider the incubator itself to be a failure and the process (or lack there of) to have dragged on, but the "incubation period" has itself been useful if only for this purpose. Take that as a statement of support supposing you seriously refactor and rescope (smaller) the incubator.
FWIW, I think this is exactly what is meant by "active oversight". Whether
it happens in the Incubator or the Jakarta PMC, it needs to happen somewhere.
-aaron
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
