> > I had a look through the updated draft and I think it addresses all the > issues and editorials that i identified in my LC review. Adding the comments > on the state diagram is probably OK. I won't push the idea of capitalising > quantum etc. any further. > > In the light of Brian C's note and his exchange with Dave about labels, I > think Dave might add a few words about using the label as a classification > mechanism. > > I don't know if you have had any other comments - check with Martin whether > he wants you to publish the updated version before the end of last call since > it is the day of the IESG meeting.
Elwyn, Many thanks for your (once again!) in-depth and useful review. I think we’ve progressed far enough that I’m confident I can ballot no-objection for this draft. Thanks, all. Jari
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
