I note that archive.org is doing a great job of rescuing broken links nowadays with wikipedia, and it's anybody's guess how long ibm will last.
But perhaps just starting with an archive.org link would prove a good long term solution for the ietf? https://web.archive.org/web/20151003174154/http://www2.rdrop.com/~paulmck/scalability/paper/sfq.2002.06.04.pdf Dave Täht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! https://www.gofundme.com/savewifi On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Elwyn Davies <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi. > > I'd suggest referencing it as a technical report (since that is how Paul > records it on his website) and provide the URL. In the longer term, it > could be considered problematic because there is no guarantee what the > chances are of this web site remaining accessible for the foreseeable > future. One solution would be to reference both and maybe ask Paul if he > could get it pubished in IBM's technical reports archive (I would have > thought he might have been able to swing this given his position!). If this > is done by the time the draft gets to AUTH48, the ref can be updated. > > For authoritative ruling on this consult the RFC Editor. > > Cheers, > Elwyn > > > > Sent from Samsung tablet. > -------- Original message -------- > From: Dave Taht <[email protected]> > Date: 14/03/2016 21:49 (GMT+00:00) > To: Elwyn Davies <[email protected]> > Cc: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]>, General area reviewing team > <[email protected]>, [email protected], Brian E Carpenter > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-aqm-fq-codel-05 > > There are presently some issues in the html version with the "s > > And I vastly preferred that we linked to to public, and much longer > version fo Paul's paper on SFQ, rather than the short one behind the > IEEE paywall, as is now here: > > s ] McKenney, P., "Stochastic fairness queueing", in Proceedings. IEEE > INFOCOM ’90, DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/INFCOM.1990.91316, 1990. > > http://www2.rdrop.com/~paulmck/scalability/paper/sfq.2002.06.04.pdf > > How do we go about citing that rather than the infocom one? > > > Dave Täht > Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! > https://www.gofundme.com/savewifi > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Elwyn Davies <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, Toke. >> >> I had a look through the updated draft and I think it addresses all the >> issues and editorials that i identified in my LC review. Adding the >> comments on the state diagram is probably OK. I won't push the idea of >> capitalising quantum etc. any further. >> >> In the light of Brian C's note and his exchange with Dave about labels, I >> think Dave might add a few words about using the label as a classification >> mechanism. >> >> I don't know if you have had any other comments - check with Martin >> whether >> he wants you to publish the updated version before the end of last call >> since it is the day of the IESG meeting. >> >> Thanks, >> Elwyn >> >> >> >> Sent from Samsung tablet. >> -------- Original message -------- >> From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> >> Date: 13/03/2016 12:19 (GMT+00:00) >> To: Elwyn Davies <[email protected]> >> Cc: General area reviewing team <[email protected]>, >> [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-aqm-fq-codel-05 >> >> Hi Elwyn >> >> I have now been through your comments and produced an updated version of >> the draft. It is available from here: >> https://kau.toke.dk/ietf/draft-ietf-aqm-fq-codel-06.html (or .txt if you >> prefer). >> >> Most of your comments I have just incorporated (variants of), with a >> single stylistic exception as noted below. I *think* I managed to cover >> everything, but I did this in two sittings, so something may have >> slipped through the cracks, I suppose. Let me know if that is the case. >> >> I believe Dave has replied to most of your other comments, so I won't go >> through them again unless you point out something I missed. For the full >> diff (of the source document), see here: >> >> https://github.com/dtaht/bufferbloat-rfcs/commit/0d7f1963cc27d11129bcb5fe2affb90ebc6e67d3 >> >> Cheers, >> >> -Toke >> >> >> Elwyn Davies <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> General: It would be helpful to capitalize Quantum throughout (or at >>> least from s3 onwards) to emphasise that it is a configured value. >>> Likewise Interval and Target parameters. Maybe also Flow and Queue as >>> they a defined terms. >> >> I think this is the only stylistic change I haven't made. I thought it >> made it more difficult to read, not less. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
