Hi Dave, On 14/03/2016 06:18, Dave Taht wrote:
... > I tend to think operational issues with the flow label are going to > continue to prevent it from being used widely, and those 24 bits > essentially unused for eternity. Actually it's only 20 bits and I believe the latest RFCs don't actually have operational problems; they just need to be supported in all stacks. But that's another conversation. ... > Anyway, going back to revising the draft, if something like my third > paragraph above needs to be incorporated, ok. We could mention the > flow label as a potential thing to hash on, if you want. I would at most suggest those few words. Since the text uses "such as" or something like that, it isn't essential. Rgds Brian _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
