There are presently some issues in the html version with the "s And I vastly preferred that we linked to to public, and much longer version fo Paul's paper on SFQ, rather than the short one behind the IEEE paywall, as is now here:
s ] McKenney, P., "Stochastic fairness queueing", in Proceedings. IEEE INFOCOM ’90, DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/INFCOM.1990.91316, 1990. http://www2.rdrop.com/~paulmck/scalability/paper/sfq.2002.06.04.pdf How do we go about citing that rather than the infocom one? Dave Täht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! https://www.gofundme.com/savewifi On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Elwyn Davies <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Toke. > > I had a look through the updated draft and I think it addresses all the > issues and editorials that i identified in my LC review. Adding the > comments on the state diagram is probably OK. I won't push the idea of > capitalising quantum etc. any further. > > In the light of Brian C's note and his exchange with Dave about labels, I > think Dave might add a few words about using the label as a classification > mechanism. > > I don't know if you have had any other comments - check with Martin whether > he wants you to publish the updated version before the end of last call > since it is the day of the IESG meeting. > > Thanks, > Elwyn > > > > Sent from Samsung tablet. > -------- Original message -------- > From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> > Date: 13/03/2016 12:19 (GMT+00:00) > To: Elwyn Davies <[email protected]> > Cc: General area reviewing team <[email protected]>, > [email protected] > Subject: Re: Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-aqm-fq-codel-05 > > Hi Elwyn > > I have now been through your comments and produced an updated version of > the draft. It is available from here: > https://kau.toke.dk/ietf/draft-ietf-aqm-fq-codel-06.html (or .txt if you > prefer). > > Most of your comments I have just incorporated (variants of), with a > single stylistic exception as noted below. I *think* I managed to cover > everything, but I did this in two sittings, so something may have > slipped through the cracks, I suppose. Let me know if that is the case. > > I believe Dave has replied to most of your other comments, so I won't go > through them again unless you point out something I missed. For the full > diff (of the source document), see here: > https://github.com/dtaht/bufferbloat-rfcs/commit/0d7f1963cc27d11129bcb5fe2affb90ebc6e67d3 > > Cheers, > > -Toke > > > Elwyn Davies <[email protected]> writes: > >> General: It would be helpful to capitalize Quantum throughout (or at >> least from s3 onwards) to emphasise that it is a configured value. >> Likewise Interval and Target parameters. Maybe also Flow and Queue as >> they a defined terms. > > I think this is the only stylistic change I haven't made. I thought it > made it more difficult to read, not less. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
