-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/05/11 03:49, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:50, Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com> wrote:
>>> I definitely think that if there is a policy change that an allowance be
>>> made for weekends/holidays and that if a patch has been identified and
>>> the offender has acknowledged the issue and is actively working on the
>>> problem give the offender time to resolve the issue.
>>
>> This weekends/holidays allowance would be dangerous and counter-productive:
>> people would rush to install risky changes on Friday and leave for the
>> week-end fingers crossed.  This would be worse than the current policy IMO.
> 
> I agree.  If it's broken, it should be taken out.  It doesn't make a
> lot of difference to the patch owner, and if the fix takes more than a
> day or so to be produced, then the cost of the breakage is much
> higher.  As an example, I recently broke ObjC++, and the fix for it
> took more than 3-4 days to get in.  My patch should've been reverted
> in the meantime.
It can make a huge difference if the owner has been unable to reproduce
and is waiting on the reporter to provide enough information to
reproduce or debug the problem.

I the case of the current x86 breakage, the only problem I've been aware
of was an internal report from bkoz that bootstrap was breaking on
x86_64 (with no other details).  Meanwhile my bootstraps were running
fine.  It wasn't until HJ's autotester reported the key
"--disable-checking" configury bits that we were able to confirm a
problem and start the real process of diagnosing what went wrong.


Jeff
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmxxoAAoJEBRtltQi2kC7ShUH/A5sQ+9Hyu3E9AxEyyVWuCl8
FSu/szFMK4Qm/ES9LzFp/uVgfF9f5qKQSIJ9h4zC6IiByJqgerlBt3y2SpN3RZhS
OMh76Jk7bnVjeOoHes1ZLxkWN3Eey73Q57WyH9jyqmSouTZqpPG686QBd17Lkslu
79d6BVz3YCFagZtNGES74HJAMJUrlrt5ywu1UEwKvMVrOOjOgLv4mzJ/xwb+3nM+
yRt9AcIm5adzqdiqg5TPb4ncm67BD34lwQOzJATgrc724+9jp0TQMhcC5U/AoOGS
vExVGwxyS8Zhl2JOa5oSl3Re+fXcczUwfkhn5Nfncxr2yo/JVuV3m4309Rz6/kw=
=hC4Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to