On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Bernd Schmidt <ber...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > On 04/05/2011 08:26 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Bernd Schmidt <ber...@codesourcery.com> >> wrote: >> >>> For i686-linux bootstraps it's hard to argue against it, but in general >>> I find it easier to cope with the occasional broken tree than with >>> getting patches reverted when you can't reproduce the failure. >> >> Maybe you find that easier, but auto-testers do not. > > The auto-testers serve the developers, not the other way round.
At least our ones were completely unaffected and appearantly couldn't reproduce the bootstrap failure either. Richard.
