-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/05/11 02:50, Eric Botcazou wrote: >> I definitely think that if there is a policy change that an allowance be >> made for weekends/holidays and that if a patch has been identified and >> the offender has acknowledged the issue and is actively working on the >> problem give the offender time to resolve the issue. > > This weekends/holidays allowance would be dangerous and counter-productive: > people would rush to install risky changes on Friday and leave for the > week-end fingers crossed. This would be worse than the current policy IMO. If we have any such developers, then, frankly, those developer's patches should be ignored.
Personally, I don't think we have any developers that want to throw stuff over the wall in that manner. jeff -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmxM4AAoJEBRtltQi2kC7LNoH/RY8IOj+kcsOBb3+XqEu8sGl GX62E4MOvklNz9l441TGT40aAsCaK2a6KQfJ7xfeQbOM6iwLZ5LKDafaqPjEpB3W zllqae9EZdA8qrRV+oi/dQLvVAsUU9T3G/83VyxU9SfkjzTC6VWZP/v1/6BUx4pO /yVDi5hoVIiM+KuP2y0bPrhHxugseft6VAuPH4s+OFR3rM991S9DawPx6jBPljsZ QTDuxAptzBfmxOaIg+MDfGA1qMpCY/5lhPu41ILbTAgh8RD+ZI03131WdzuNwk7K duxhUJUdhHW2Y74U3dBesDLg/wRx/oXCB2h63azhJayavPQ5NNFOPc48Br+voTk= =sU5a -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
