On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Bernd Schmidt <ber...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > On 04/05/2011 08:26 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Bernd Schmidt <ber...@codesourcery.com> >> wrote: >> >>> For i686-linux bootstraps it's hard to argue against it, but in general >>> I find it easier to cope with the occasional broken tree than with >>> getting patches reverted when you can't reproduce the failure. >> >> Maybe you find that easier, but auto-testers do not. > > The auto-testers serve the developers, not the other way round.
The auto-testers serve no-one if they are broken. And developers also serve other developers. If you had just reverted your patches after being "mobbed" then we would not have this discussion in the first place. Ciao! Steven
