gcc  

Messages by Thread

• gcc-13-20260416 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• RFC: Another pass_late_combine after pass_reorder_blocks? Uros Bizjak via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Another pass_late_combine after pass_reorder_blocks? Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Another pass_late_combine after pass_reorder_blocks? Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Another pass_late_combine after pass_reorder_blocks? Uros Bizjak via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Another pass_late_combine after pass_reorder_blocks? Uros Bizjak via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Another pass_late_combine after pass_reorder_blocks? Uros Bizjak via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Another pass_late_combine after pass_reorder_blocks? Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Another pass_late_combine after pass_reorder_blocks? Uros Bizjak via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Another pass_late_combine after pass_reorder_blocks? Uros Bizjak via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Another pass_late_combine after pass_reorder_blocks? Uros Bizjak via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Another pass_late_combine after pass_reorder_blocks? Uros Bizjak via Gcc
• [RFC] redesigning callbacks for make_forwarder_block Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] redesigning callbacks for make_forwarder_block Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] redesigning callbacks for make_forwarder_block Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: [RFC] redesigning callbacks for make_forwarder_block Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• gccrs March 2026 Monthly report Arthur Cohen
• See You at CLEANPOWER 2026 | Houston, TX, USA Kairy Zof via Gcc
• [GSoC] Update on initial stage progress Sebastian Galindo via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Update on initial stage progress Thomas Schwinge
• Glob to match bare-metal SuperH target triple in config.gcc seems wrong (sh*-superh-elf)? John Scott via Gcc
  • Re: Glob to match bare-metal SuperH target triple in config.gcc seems wrong (sh*-superh-elf)? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz via Gcc
  • Re: Glob to match bare-metal SuperH target triple in config.gcc seems wrong (sh*-superh-elf)? Andrew Stubbs
• Learning the GCC AST structure Septicake via Gcc
• gcc-16-20260412 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-15-20260411 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20260410 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-13-20260409 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Sourceware Survey results and Budget priority discussions Mark Wielaard
  • Re: Sourceware Survey results and Budget priority discussions Mark Wielaard
• Extract function properties soma pal via Gcc
  • Re: Extract function properties soma pal via Gcc
  • Re: Extract function properties David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Extract function properties soma pal via Gcc
• Sourceware infrastructure updates for Q1 2026 Mark Wielaard
• gcc-16-20260405 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-15-20260404 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc bootstrap build Ridham Khurana via Gcc
• gcc-14-20260403 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Update on community health Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Update on community health David Edelsohn via Gcc
  • Re: Update on community health Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Update on community health Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Update on community health Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Update on community health Thomas Koenig via Gcc
  • Re: Update on community health Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• gcc-13-20260402 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [RFC] On sending forge pull request discussions to the mailing list Claudio Bantaloukas via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] On sending forge pull request discussions to the mailing list Christophe Lyon via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] On sending forge pull request discussions to the mailing list Claudio Bantaloukas via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] On sending forge pull request discussions to the mailing list Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] On sending forge pull request discussions to the mailing list Richard Earnshaw (foss) via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] On sending forge pull request discussions to the mailing list Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] On sending forge pull request discussions to the mailing list Richard Earnshaw (foss) via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] On sending forge pull request discussions to the mailing list Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] On sending forge pull request discussions to the mailing list Richard Earnshaw (foss) via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] On sending forge pull request discussions to the mailing list Claudio Bantaloukas via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] On sending forge pull request discussions to the mailing list Christophe Lyon via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] On sending forge pull request discussions to the mailing list Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] On sending forge pull request discussions to the mailing list Claudio Bantaloukas via Gcc
• [GSoC] OpenMP/libgomp proposal submission Bruno Ortega via Gcc
• Re: [GSoC 2026 Proposal] libgomp Optimizations for Scheduler Guided OpenMP Execution Himadri Chhaya-Shailesh via Gcc
• [GSOC 2026] Expanding string and memory modelling in the static analyzer Saish Kambali via Gcc
• LLVM FP atomic min/max variants alignment Matthew Malcomson via Gcc
  • Re: LLVM FP atomic min/max variants alignment Gonzalo Brito via Gcc
• Writing a New Operator Septicake via Gcc
  • Writing a New Operator Septicake via Gcc
• gcc-16-20260329 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 404s in https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-dr-status.html Gerald Pfeifer
• gcc-15-20260328 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• GSoC 2026 Inquiry: Non-recursive demangler for libiberty Peeyush Maurya via Gcc
• gcc-14-20260327 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [GSoC 2026] Enhance OpenACC support - Formal proposal draft Sebastian Galindo via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC 2026] Enhance OpenACC support - Formal proposal draft Thomas Schwinge
  • Re: [GSoC 2026] Enhance OpenACC support - Formal proposal draft Sebastian Galindo via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC 2026] Enhance OpenACC support - Formal proposal draft Sebastian Galindo via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC 2026] Enhance OpenACC support - Formal proposal draft Thomas Schwinge
  • Re: [GSoC 2026] Enhance OpenACC support - Formal proposal draft Sebastian Galindo via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC 2026] Enhance OpenACC support - Formal proposal draft Sebastian Galindo via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC 2026] Enhance OpenACC support - Formal proposal draft Thomas Schwinge
  • Re: [GSoC 2026] Enhance OpenACC support - Formal proposal draft Sebastian Galindo via Gcc
• gcc-13-20260326 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Data info of CIM CONNECT Convention + Expo 2026 carlkling9--- via Gcc
• Patch submission for model strnlen Saish Kambali via Gcc
  • Re: Patch submission for model strnlen David Malcolm via Gcc
• [RFC][GSoC] Improving gcc on Windows targets Joseph Tay via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC][GSoC] Improving gcc on Windows targets Julian Waters via Gcc
• changes requesting for GCC 17 Release Criteria (secondary targets) Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: changes requesting for GCC 17 Release Criteria (secondary targets) Iain Sandoe via Gcc
  • Re: changes requesting for GCC 17 Release Criteria (secondary targets) Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: changes requesting for GCC 17 Release Criteria (secondary targets) Dongsheng Song via Gcc
  • Re: changes requesting for GCC 17 Release Criteria (secondary targets) Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: changes requesting for GCC 17 Release Criteria (secondary targets) Dongsheng Song via Gcc
  • Re: changes requesting for GCC 17 Release Criteria (secondary targets) Rainer Orth via Gcc
  • Re: changes requesting for GCC 17 Release Criteria (secondary targets) Janne Blomqvist via Gcc
  • Re: changes requesting for GCC 17 Release Criteria (secondary targets) Rainer Orth via Gcc
  • Re: changes requesting for GCC 17 Release Criteria (secondary targets) Jeffrey Law via Gcc
  • Re: changes requesting for GCC 17 Release Criteria (secondary targets) Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: changes requesting for GCC 17 Release Criteria (secondary targets) Jeffrey Law via Gcc
  • Re: changes requesting for GCC 17 Release Criteria (secondary targets) Mark Wielaard
  • Re: changes requesting for GCC 17 Release Criteria (secondary targets) Jeffrey Law via Gcc
  • Re: changes requesting for GCC 17 Release Criteria (secondary targets) Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: changes requesting for GCC 17 Release Criteria (secondary targets) Jeffrey Law via Gcc
  • Re: changes requesting for GCC 17 Release Criteria (secondary targets) LIU Hao via Gcc
  • Re: changes requesting for GCC 17 Release Criteria (secondary targets) Jonathan Yong via Gcc
  • Re: changes requesting for GCC 17 Release Criteria (secondary targets) Jason Merrill via Gcc
  • Re: changes requesting for GCC 17 Release Criteria (secondary targets) Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• GSoC 2026: Make cp-mangler non-recursive Zeng, Yu X via Gcc
• Optimization level -O1 hardcoded in gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Make-lang.in Emanuele Rocca
• [GSoC 2026] kf_strnlen implementation and patch submission Saish Kambali via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC 2026] kf_strnlen implementation and patch submission David Malcolm via Gcc
• Constant Pool Anchors Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
• gcc-16-20260322 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• GSoC 2026 Proposal: Improving OOB detection for FAMs in -fanalyzer Virginia Hany via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026 Proposal: Improving OOB detection for FAMs in -fanalyzer Virginia Hany via Gcc
  • Follow-up: GSoC proposals for GCC -fanalyzer Virginia Hany via Gcc
• Contribution to Static Analyzer: Looking for "Good First Issues" (known_functions) Virginia Hany via Gcc
  • Re: Contribution to Static Analyzer: Looking for "Good First Issues" (known_functions) David Malcolm via Gcc
• gcc-15-20260321 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20260320 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [GSOC 2026] Implementation of kf_strnlen and follow-up on Testsuite Saish Kambali via Gcc
• libiberty: potential bugs in mkstemps Tomás Ortín Fernández via Gcc
• Sourceware Survey 2026 Mark Wielaard
  • Re: Sourceware Survey 2026 Mark Wielaard
• Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Claudio Bantaloukas via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Christophe Lyon via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Claudio Bantaloukas via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Pietro Monteiro via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Claudio Bantaloukas via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Rainer Orth via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Paul Koning via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Paul Koning via Gcc
• Request for COURSERA ACCOUNT Sak via Gcc
  • Re: Request for COURSERA ACCOUNT Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Robert Dubner
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Richard Biener via Gcc
  • RE: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Robert Dubner
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. David Malcolm via Gcc
  • RE: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Robert Dubner
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. James K. Lowden
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Richard Biener via Gcc
  • RE: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Robert Dubner
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Richard Biener via Gcc
  • RE: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Robert Dubner
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Richard Biener via Gcc
  • RE: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Robert Dubner
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Richard Biener via Gcc
  • RE: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Robert Dubner
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Richard Biener via Gcc
• gcc-13-20260319 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• cannot report bug: -Wuninitialized not detected when certain function call exists m2rad0--- via Gcc
  • Re: cannot report bug: -Wuninitialized not detected when certain function call exists Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• [GSOC 2026] Developed the testsuite for strnlen() and the procedure to implement kf_strnlen() Saish Kambali via Gcc
• Re: Experiment-0: Submission of Final Report(Scheduler) Himadri Chhaya-Shailesh via Gcc
• [GSoC][RFC] Extending C++ support in -fanalyzer Egas Ribeiro via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC][RFC] Extending C++ support in -fanalyzer David Malcolm via Gcc
• Proposed GSoC project to add Data Race Detection to GCC GNAT Ada front end Tucker Taft via Gcc
• Request for GSoC Proposal Feedback Stefan Weigl-Bosker via Gcc
• Google disabled my account Tomás Ortín Fernández via Gcc
  • Re: Google disabled my account David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Google disabled my account Tomás Ortín Fernández via Gcc
  • Re: Google disabled my account Martin Jambor
  • Re: Google disabled my account Tomás Ortín Fernández via Gcc
• Re: GSoC 2026: Experiment-0 Complete (All 4 Phases) Himadri Chhaya-Shailesh via Gcc
• [GSOC 2026] Completed the Newbies guide & proposal for strnlen implementation Saish Kambali via Gcc
  • Re: [GSOC 2026] Completed the Newbies guide & proposal for strnlen implementation David Malcolm via Gcc
• [GSoC PATCH] libiberty: use heap-backed parse state in d_demangle Jialong Wang via Gcc
• [PATCH] libiberty: use heap-backed parse state in d_demangle Jialong Wang via Gcc
• RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Michael Matz via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Michael Matz via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Michael Matz via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Michael Clark via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Michael Clark via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Andrew Stubbs

• Earlier messages