> From: Florian Weimer <f...@deneb.enyo.de> > Cc: DJ Delorie <d...@redhat.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, seze...@gmail.com > Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:43:53 +0200 > > * Eli Zaretskii: > > > If my arithmetics is correct, about 70% of its files is LGPL, the > > rest GPL. Which doesn't keep many GNU projects under GPL from using > > Gnulib. > > Sorry, I don't understand. Surely anything released under the LGPL by > the FSF can be upgraded to the current GPLv3? First upgrade to the > latest LGPL, then switch over to the GPLv3? > > (I assume that the FSF releases their works under the “any later > version” regime.)
The above was in response to DJ's questions up-thread: > > Because Ozkan wants to use it in an otherwise LGPL package. > > But then the implementation would need relicensing as well, wouldn't > it? > > Having both under different licenses is just confusing. Did I misunderstand the question?
