* Eli Zaretskii: >> From: DJ Delorie <d...@redhat.com> >> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, seze...@gmail.com >> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:52:10 -0400 >> >> >> Most of the files in include/ are GPL, not LGPL. Why is this one >> different? > > Because Ozkan wants to use it in an otherwise LGPL package.
But then the implementation would need relicensing as well, wouldn't it? Having both under different licenses is just confusing.
