On Sep 27, 2016, Ozkan Sezer <seze...@gmail.com> wrote: > FYI: What I originally wanted was an authorization _for me_ to use > filenames.h in LGPL projects with LGPL license notice; the version > I use is modified (not refer to any external code other than libc, > i.e. only macros and inlines) and doesn't include hashtab.h either; > therefore I believe that my request is fulfilled and is not subject > to the concerns raised by you guys.
It would probably be wise for you to amend the modified copy you'll distribute with the changes proposd by Eli, and to add a link to this thread in the archives, should anyone be surprised by the different license. As for the copy in GCC, that has additional code, we can then keep it under the stronger copyleft defenses. Does that work for everyone involved? -- Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/ You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member Free Software Evangelist|Red Hat Brasil GNU Toolchain Engineer
