> From: DJ Delorie <d...@redhat.com> > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, seze...@gmail.com > Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:00:46 -0400 > > > Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> writes: > > Because Ozkan wants to use it in an otherwise LGPL package. > > Ok, but that doesn't say why it's different. That reason could apply to > any header in there. Do we need to convert all headers there to LGPL?
I understand that Ozkan only needs that one. Ozkan? > Is this "otherwise LGPL package" in one of our repos, or elsewhere? Is > he aware that filenames.h includes hashtab.h, which is GPL? > > (I'm not opposed to the change, just trying to make sure I understand > it's scope) I'll let Ozkan answer these questions. But if someone wants to know which libraries need that, one of them is this: http://libtimidity.sourceforge.net/
