> From: Florian Weimer <f...@deneb.enyo.de> > Cc: DJ Delorie <d...@redhat.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, seze...@gmail.com > Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:54:59 +0200 > > >> Most of the files in include/ are GPL, not LGPL. Why is this one > >> different? > > > > Because Ozkan wants to use it in an otherwise LGPL package. > > But then the implementation would need relicensing as well, wouldn't > it?
Which implementation? of Ozkan's library? Why would it need to change? It's perfectly okay to link GPL code with LGPL code, we do this all the time with libgcc, no? Or am I missing something? > Having both under different licenses is just confusing. AFAIK, that ship sailed a long time ago, in several projects, including Binutils and GDB.
