On 9/28/16, Alexandre Oliva <aol...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sep 27, 2016, Ozkan Sezer <seze...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> FYI: What I originally wanted was an authorization _for me_ to use >> filenames.h in LGPL projects with LGPL license notice; the version >> I use is modified (not refer to any external code other than libc, >> i.e. only macros and inlines) and doesn't include hashtab.h either; >> therefore I believe that my request is fulfilled and is not subject >> to the concerns raised by you guys. > > It would probably be wise for you to amend the modified copy you'll > distribute with the changes proposd by Eli, and to add a link to this > thread in the archives, should anyone be surprised by the different > license.
I believe the following is enough? https://sf.net/p/libtimidity/libtimidity/ci/master/tree/src/filenames.h > As for the copy in GCC, that has additional code, we can then keep it > under the stronger copyleft defenses. > > Does that work for everyone involved? For me, yes. -- O.S.
