Please excuse the late response, I was distracted a bit. What is the reason 
that one or more languages are essential for meta awareness? I guess we all 
agree that all animals know their environment and are aware of it. This is 
necessary to move around in it, to find food and to avoid predators. Their 
biological blueprint can be found in their DNA.Therefore one language is 
necessary for the (DNA) code to specify an actor which is embedded in a world 
and able to move around in it. Beings who are embedded in an environment can 
perceive everything except themselves because the own self is the center of all 
perceptions that can not be perceived itself. As observers we are always 
attached to our own bodies. The own person is the blind spot which a person is 
unable to see or hear clearly.A second language is necessary to get access to 
the world of language and to move around in it. It is not necessary for salmons 
who come back to the stream where they were born (they use smell to do this) or 
for ants who follow pheromones to find the shortest path to tasty food sources. 
But it is necessary for us to become aware of ourself because it allows us to 
remove the limitations of the blind spot. To consider ourself as an object of 
reflection requires the ability to perceive ourself in the first 
place.Paradoxically it is the blind spot of the inability to perceive the own 
self that makes the "I" special. As Gilbert Ryle writes in his book "the 
concept of mind" on page 198 "‘I’, in my use of it, always indicates me and 
only indicates me. ‘You’, ‘she’ and ‘they’ indicate different people at 
different times. ‘I’ is like my ownshadow; I can never get away from it, as I 
can get away from your shadow. There is no mystery about this constancy, but I 
mention it because it seems to endow ‘I’ with a mystifying uniqueness and 
adhesiveness."Is this a baby step in the right direction? I am not sure.-J.
-------- Original message --------From: Nicholas Thompson 
<thompnicks...@gmail.com> Date: 7/8/24  11:20 PM  (GMT+01:00) To: The Friday 
Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com> Subject: Re: 
[FRIAM] Why the Mystery of Consciousness Is Deeper Than We Thought i am moved 
by the romance and beauty of your account, but ultimately left hungry for 
experiences I can put my foot on.You and I are clearly inclined to disagree, 
and I was raised to experience disagreement as a discomfort..  So how then are 
we to precede.  I think, not withstandijng Goethe and Cervantes, that baby 
steps is the only way. Of course, you might be citing Goethe and Cervantes as 
authorities on the matter, in which case I can only reply, perhaps blushing 
slightly at my own callousness, that they are not so for me.  So, what facts of 
the matter convince you that one or more languages are essential for meta 
awareess.  Or is it elf-evidentOn Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 4:49 PM Jochen Fromm 
<j...@cas-group.net> wrote:IMHO it is not one language which is necessary, but 
more than one. Languages can be used to create worlds, to move around it them, 
and to share these wolds with others. Tolkien and J.K. Rowling have created 
whole universes. The interesting things happen if worlds collide, if they merge 
and melt, or if they drift apart.Cervantes in Spain, Goethe in Germany and 
Dante in Italy helped to create new languages - Spanish, German and Italian, 
respectively. They also examined in their most famous books what happens if 
worlds collide. Cervantes describes in "Don Quixote" what happens when 
imaginary and real worlds collide and are so out of sync that the actors are 
getting lost.Goethe decribes in his "Faust" what happens when collective and 
individual worlds collide, i.e. when egoistic individuals exploit the world 
selfishly for their own benefit (in his first book "The sorrows of young 
Werther" Goethe focused like Fontane and Freud on the opposite).Dante describes 
in his "Divine Comedy"what happens when worlds diverge and people are excluded 
and expelled from the world.Language is necessary for self awareness because it 
provides the building blocks for a new world which is connected but also 
independent from the old one. This allows new dimensions of interactions. The 
connections between worlds matter. A label is a simple connection between a 
word in one world and an class of objects in another. A metaphor is a more 
complex connection between an abstract idea and a composition of objects, 
etc.-J.-------- Original message --------From: Nicholas Thompson 
<thompnicks...@gmail.com> Date: 7/7/24  5:13 PM  (GMT+01:00) To: The Friday 
Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com> Subject: Re: 
[FRIAM] Why the Mystery of Consciousness Is Deeper Than We Thought I think of 
large language models as the most embodied things on the planet, but let that 
go for a moment.  Back to baby steps. Can you lay out for me why you believe 
that language is essential to self-awareness.  Does that believe arise from 
ideology, authority, or some set of facts I need to take account of.  To be 
honest here, I should say where I am coming from.  A lot of my so-called career 
was spent  railing against circular reasoning in evolutionary theory and 
psychology.  So, if language is essential to self-awareness, and animals do not 
have language, then it indeed follows that animals do not have self-awareness.  
But what if our method for detecting self awareness requires language? Now we 
are in a loop.  Are we in such a loop, or are there facts of some matter, 
independent of language, convince you that animals are not self-aware.  Is self 
awareness extricable from language?It is an old old trope that animals are 
automata but that humans have soul.  Descartes swore by it.  Is "language" the 
new soul?Nick On Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 7:29 AM Jochen Fromm <j...@cas-group.net> 
wrote:I would say cats, dogs and horses don't have meta-awareness because they 
lack language. They live in the present moment, in the here and now. Without 
language they do not have the capability to reflect on their past or to think 
about their future. They can not formulate stories of themselves which could 
help to form a sense of identity. Language is the mirror in which we perceive 
ourselves during "this is me" moments. Animals lack this mirror completely. One 
dimensional scents trails do not count as language.Large languages models lack 
consciousness because they do not have a body which is embedded as a actor in 
an environment. These two things are necessary: the physical world of bodies, 
and the mental world of language. When both collide in the same spot we can get 
consciousness.-J.-------- Original message --------From: Nicholas Thompson 
<thompnicks...@gmail.com> Date: 7/6/24  5:05 AM  (GMT+01:00) To: The Friday 
Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com> Subject: Re: 
[FRIAM] Why the Mystery of Consciousness Is Deeper Than We Thought Well, that's 
because Socrates claimed not to know what he thought, and since I genuinely 
don[t know what I think until I work it out, the conversation has the same 
quality.  I apologize for that.  my students found it truly distressing. So, if 
you will indulge me, why don't  you think your cat has meta=awareness?   
Authority, ideology, or is there some experience you have had that leads you to 
think that.   It would be kind of odd if it she didn't because animals have all 
sorts of ways of distinguishing self from other. They have ways of knowinng 
that "I did that".  (e.g., scent marking?) On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 3:19 PM 
Jochen Fromm <j...@cas-group.net> wrote:Well yes, if meta-awareness is defined 
as acting in response to one's own awareness then I would say animals like a 
cat don't have it but humans have. As an example I could say this almost feels 
like I am a participant in a dialogue from Plato...I would be surprised if it 
can be described in simple terms. If the essence of consciousness is subjective 
experience then it is indeed hard to describe by a theory although there are 
many attempts. Persons who perceive things differently are wired differently. 
And what is more subjective than the perception of oneself? 
https://informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/what-is-consciousness/If we 
can describe it mathematically then probably as a way an information feels if 
it is processed in complex ways, ad infinitum like the orbits of a strange 
attractor.https://chaoticatmospheres.com/mathrules-strange-attractors-J.--------
 Original message --------From: Nicholas Thompson <thompnicks...@gmail.com> 
Date: 7/5/24  6:56 PM  (GMT+01:00) To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity 
Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Why the Mystery of 
Consciousness Is Deeper Than We Thought ,Great!  Baby steps. "If we aren't 
moving slowly, we aren't moving."   So, can I define some new terms, 
tentatively, per explorandum ? Let's call acting-in-respect-to-the-world, 
"awareness".   Allowing this definition, we certainly seem to agree that the 
cat is aware.  Lets define meta-awareness as acting i respect to one's own 
awareness.  Now, am I correct in assuming that you identify meta-awareness with 
consciousness and that you think that the cat is not meta-aware and that I 
probably am?  And further that you think that meta-awareness requires 
consciousness?Nick On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 12:17 PM Jochen Fromm 
<j...@cas-group.net> wrote:I would say a cat is conscious in the sense that it 
is aware of its immediate environment. Cats are nocturnal animals who hunt at 
night and mostly sleep during the day. Consciousness in the sense of being 
aware of oneself as an actor in an environment requires understanding of 
language which only humans have ( and LLMs now 
)https://www.quantamagazine.org/insects-and-other-animals-have-consciousness-experts-declare-20240419/-J.--------
 Original message --------From: Nicholas Thompson <thompnicks...@gmail.com> 
Date: 7/5/24  5:02 AM  (GMT+01:00) To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity 
Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Why the Mystery of 
Consciousness Is Deeper Than We Thought Jochen, I think the first step in any 
conversation is to decide whether your cat is conscious.  If so, why do you 
think so; if not, likewise.  I had a facinnationg conversation with  GBT about  
whether he was conscious and he denied it "hotly", which, of course, met one of 
his criteria for consciousness.  So.  Is your cat  connscious?Nick On Thu, Jul 
4, 2024 at 7:26 PM Jochen Fromm <j...@cas-group.net> wrote:I don't get Philip 
Goff: first we send our children 20 years to school, from Kindergarten to 
college and university, to teach them all kinds of languages, and then we 
wonder how they can be conscious. It will be the same for AI: first we spend 
millions and millions to train them all available knowledge, and then we wonder 
how they can develop understanding of language and 
consciousness...https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-mystery-of-consciousness-is-deeper-than-we-thought/-J.-.
 --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to