Whether tensors represent individuals influence on one another across different properties, or just the relationships between properties, I think it is all evolving. The Republicans go from a fiscally and socially conservative organization to an organization concerned more with nativism and fascism. The operator seems less constrained than computing spatial frames for an object with a fixed shape?
From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Stephen Guerin Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2022 10:06 AM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] quotes and questions On Thu, May 12, 2022, 8:54 PM Marcus Daniels <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Unitary operators are needed. Apply a Trumping operator you get a Biden and apply another one to get a Trump back. As we project our political views onto the other, the unitary operator in this projective geometry might be the fundamental-ist matrix ;-) see: sing-along to the Fundamental Matrix in Computer Vision https://youtu.be/DgGV3l82NTk in computer vision or https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_matrix_(linear_differential_equation) PS, this send me down a rabbit hole surf on Political Dualism, Power and Action this Sunday morning. On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 8:54 PM Marcus Daniels <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Unitary operators are needed. Apply a Trumping operator you get a Biden and apply another one to get a Trump back. To make this work a bunch of ancillary bits are needed to record all the wisdom that Trump destroys. I am afraid we are dealing with a dissipative system, though. -----Original Message----- From: Friam <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of glen Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2022 8:55 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] quotes and questions I've always wondered why we obsessively dichotomize. I've tried to express my confusion in the context of the law of noncontradiction and excluded middle since my 1st (authentic) analysis course in college. I'd caught a whiff of intuitionism by that time and asked my prof about it. He wisely feigned ignorance and suggested I do my homework. When Dave asks a question like "What is the negation of evolution?", it absolutely *begs* us to avoid negation ... this silly impulse to think in dichotomies. Negation is a stupid concept, perhaps the most Evil human invention ... maybe 2nd only to religion. And juxtaposed with evolution, which relies heavily on high-dimensional contexts, makes it crystal clear how stupid a concept negation actually is. Now, "opposition" carries much more ambiguity. One could think of it (and "reaction") in something like Newton's 3rd law. But the ambiguity also allows us to think in terms of a bushy opposition or "response", rather than negation or reaction. So kudos to the quotees who used the more ambiguous term, helping us think a little more broadly. And woe to those who read the ambiguous term and preemptively register it as the miniscule-minded concept of negation. That bushy opposition flows nicely into Dave's invocation of "stress". In the past, I've expressed affinity with the (ole timey) Cynics who flout contemporary norms and attempt for Flow. But if I'm honest, I'm actually anti-Flow ... or maybe it's a kind of processor-sliced-multi-Flow. The only time I feel authentic is when I'm surfing a stressful context ... like some adrenaline junky hopping from one brief high to another. Comfort, Groove, Flow, Eudaimonia, are most accurately mapped to something like laminar death. Turbulence is the new groovy. Flow is for squares, man. On 5/10/22 21:06, Marcus Daniels wrote: > Wokeness or antifa are two reactions to bad faith. At some point > communication is no longer occurring and it is delusional to expect a civil > dialog. When that happens it is just a matter of whether to keep taking a > beating in the name of a principle that the other party does not care about > (who IS the audience for this demonstration of futility?) or to use other > means that they cannot ignore. > > Another way to deal with Trump-like people on social media would be to scale > the the fact checking with the lying, so that liars have an unblockable > paragraph of injected correction surrounding each false claim. > Unfortunately then the squeaky wheel gets the grease, and that the narcissist > gets the attention they seek. In that sense cancellation is better. > >> On May 10, 2022, at 7:42 PM, Prof David West >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> Quotes: >> >> /"A thing without oppositions ipso facto does not exist ... existence lies >> in opposition."/ C.S. Peirce. >> >> /"It is the hallmark of any deep truth that its negation is also a deep >> truth." /Neils Bohr. >> >> Questions: >> What is the negation of evolution? Natural Selection? Survival of the >> 'Fittest'? >> >> What is the negation of 'bleeding heart liberalism'? Of Trumpism? Of >> "wokeness?" >> >> Quote: >> >> /"Examine the lives of the best and most fruitful people and peoples and ask >> yourselves whether a tree which is supposed to grow to a proud height could >> do so without bad weather and storms; /*[1]* /whether misfortune and >> external resistance, whether any kinds of hatred, jealousy, stubbornness, >> mistrust, hardness, greed, and violence to not belong to the *_favorable_* >> conditions without which any great grown even of virtue is scarecely >> possible." F. Nietzsche (emphasis his)/ >> >> *[1] *The Biosphere 2 project encountered a problem with trees falling over >> far before they reached their maturity. It was from lack of wind. Wind and >> mechanical stress was required to grow the hard tissues that allowed the >> tree to stand. >> >> Questions: >> >> To what extent do we (denizens of FRIAM and their local cultures) require >> the kinds of stress being encountered in the world? >> >> I suspect that there needs to be a balance between realizable civilization >> and stresses, but how is that balance defoined and, more importantly, found >> and maintained? >> >> Concrete example of last question: Will the Twitterites end up being a >> better or worse 'culture' post-Musk? >> >> davew -- Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe<http://bit.ly/virtualfriamun/subscribe> http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/ 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/ -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe<http://bit.ly/virtualfriamun/subscribe> http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/ 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/ 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
