Of course not. But my point was largely that disagreement takes *many* forms, not all of which are cantankerous assholery. 8^D When divvying up tasks, disagreement might come in the form of, say, a passive aggressive act of simply not writing that word down on the list ... or making a frowny face while you do so ... or simply smiling and nodding in a patronizing way. Whatever.
But agreement is, almost by definition, invisible. Can one parallel line ever *know* there's another parallel line a few inches over? Of course not, because they agree. On 5/17/22 14:41, Jon Zingale wrote:
I apologize for disagreeing and reading past the text in places. When I think about *reading* awkward social situations or divvying up grocery store tasks with my partner, disagreement is not always my preferred form of demonstrative engagement. Sometimes it is pleasant to offload some of the implementation details to a "group thought" compiler.
-- Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/ 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
