> > Odd, all of the machines that I've seen shipped lately have their > CDROMs on a secondary IDE controller as SLAVE with no master. Works > great, and the FreeBSD drivers work well when hacked to not require > a master fo there to be a slave.... i commented out one line in wd.c, wdprobe() and it works fine... The funny thing is it checks for slave, its signature etc if ATAPI is defined and then returns a 0 saying "drive 0 error" !! (In this case du->dk_error is 0x7f) -biju To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.... Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk i... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: IDE quirk i... Chris
- Re: IDE quirk i... Wes Peters
- RE: IDE quirk i... Biju Susmer
- Re: IDE quirk i... Wes Peters
- Re: IDE quirk i... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: IDE quirk i... Brian F. Feldman
- Re: IDE quirk i... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: IDE quirk i... Warner Losh
- RE: IDE quirk i... Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk i... Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk i... Biju Susmer
- Re: IDE quirk i... Soren Schmidt
- Re: IDE quirk i... Chris
- Re: IDE quirk i... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: IDE quirk i... Warner Losh
- Re: IDE quirk i... Shaun Jurrens
- Re: IDE quirk i... Warner Losh
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Sheldon Hearn
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Lofthouse Andrew 2Lt WRALC/TIECT