In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Brian F. Feldman" writes: : Since it was made to work? The problem here is that this person, for some : reason, is misconfiguring their system and expecting it to work as if it : were configured properly. Odd, all of the machines that I've seen shipped lately have their CDROMs on a secondary IDE controller as SLAVE with no master. Works great, and the FreeBSD drivers work well when hacked to not require a master fo there to be a slave.... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ... Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Chris
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Wes Peters
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Biju Susmer
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Wes Peters
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Brian F. Feldman
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Daniel O'Connor
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Warner Losh
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Biju Susmer
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Soren Schmidt
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Chris
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Warner Losh
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Shaun Jurrens
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Warner Losh
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Sheldon Hearn

