> Regardless, you have to have 1 master and 0 or 1 slaves one every IDE > controller. You can't run a controller with just a slave. > I dont think it should be a problem.. Since other OSs can work with this configuration without any problem, why FBSD should refuse this configuration? When i was using 2.2.7-stable, FBSD used to recognize my CDROM *sometimes* as slave, not always. -biju To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Cillian Sharkey
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Biju Susmer
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Cillian Sharkey
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Biju Susmer
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Cillian Sharkey
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ... Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE... Chris
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE... Wes Peters
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE... Biju Susmer
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE... Wes Peters
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE... Brian F. Feldman
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE... Warner Losh
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE... Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE... Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE... Biju Susmer
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE... Soren Schmidt
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE... Chris