On 06-Aug-99 Wes Peters wrote: > Because it's wrong. If you don't believe me, buy a copy of the spec. Why > should we waste valuable developer time trying to support mis-configured > hardware? Since when has PC hardware followed the specs? --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Cillian Sharkey
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Biju Susmer
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Cillian Sharkey
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ... Chris
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ... Wes Peters
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ... Biju Susmer
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ... Wes Peters
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ... Brian F. Feldman
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ... Warner Losh
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ... Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ... Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ... Biju Susmer
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ... Soren Schmidt
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ... Chris
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ... Warner Losh