On 06-Aug-99 Brian F. Feldman wrote: > > Since when has PC hardware followed the specs? > Since it was made to work? The problem here is that this person, for some > reason, is misconfiguring their system and expecting it to work as if it > were configured properly. Sure but a lot of PC's are shipped with a CDrom a secondary slave.. I'm not saying its RIGHT but it IS reality. --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Cillian Sharkey
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Vince Vielhaber
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Chris
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Wes Peters
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Biju Susmer
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Wes Peters
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Daniel O'Connor
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Brian F. Feldman
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Daniel O'Connor
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Warner Losh
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Biju Susmer
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Soren Schmidt
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Chris
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Warner Losh
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Shaun Jurrens
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Warner Losh
PGP signature
