Biju Susmer wrote: > > > Regardless, you have to have 1 master and 0 or 1 slaves one every IDE > > controller. You can't run a controller with just a slave. > > > I dont think it should be a problem.. Since other OSs can work with this > configuration without any problem, why FBSD should refuse this configuration? > When i was using 2.2.7-stable, FBSD used to recognize my CDROM *sometimes* as > slave, not always. Because it's wrong. If you don't believe me, buy a copy of the spec. Why should we waste valuable developer time trying to support mis-configured hardware? -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC http://softweyr.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Biju Susmer
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Cillian Sharkey
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Biju Susmer
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Cillian Sharkey
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ... Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Chris
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Wes Peters
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Biju Susmer
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Wes Peters
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Brian F. Feldman
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Warner Losh
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Biju Susmer
- RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Biju Susmer
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Soren Schmidt
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Chris
- Re: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE ker... Daniel C. Sobral