fortran  

Messages by Date

• 2025/04/25 Source allocation of pure function result rejected Damian Rouson
• 2025/04/25 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix procedure pointer handling with -fcheck=pointer [PR102900] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/04/24 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix procedure pointer handling with -fcheck=pointer [PR102900] Jerry D
• 2025/04/24 [PATCH] Fortran: fix procedure pointer handling with -fcheck=pointer [PR102900] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/04/23 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR119200, v1] Use correct locus while check()ing coarray functions. Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/23 [committed] OpenMP: Add libgomp.fortran/target-enter-data-8.f90 Tobias Burnus
• 2025/04/22 Re: [patch fortran] PR119836 [15/16 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT Jakub Jelinek
• 2025/04/22 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR119200, v1] Use correct locus while check()ing coarray functions. Harald Anlauf
• 2025/04/22 Re: [patch fortran] PR119836 [15/16 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT Jerry D
• 2025/04/22 [Fortran, Patch, PR119200, v1] Use correct locus while check()ing coarray functions. Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/22 Re: [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 6/5] Various fixes for F2018 teams support Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/18 Re: [patch fortran] PR119836 [15/16 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT Jerry D
• 2025/04/18 Re: [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 6/5] Various fixes for F2018 teams support Jerry D
• 2025/04/18 [patch fortran] PR119836 [15/16 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT Jerry D
• 2025/04/18 Re: Fortran 15.0.1 treats "shiftl" as impure ZAPART CHRISTOPHER ANDREW
• 2025/04/18 Re: Fortran 15.0.1 treats "shiftl" as impure Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/04/18 Re: [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 6/5] Various fixes for F2018 teams support (was: Re: [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 0/5] Improve on Fortran 2018 teams support) Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/04/18 Re: [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 6/5] Various fixes for F2018 teams support Jerry D
• 2025/04/18 Re: [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 6/5] Various fixes for F2018 teams support Jerry D
• 2025/04/18 Re: [Patch] Fortran/OpenMP: Support automatic mapping allocatable components (deep mapping) Thomas Schwinge
• 2025/04/17 Re: 15 is now at or very near release Andrew Pinski
• 2025/04/17 15 is now at or very near release Jerry D
• 2025/04/17 [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 6/5] Various fixes for F2018 teams support (was: Re: [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 0/5] Improve on Fortran 2018 teams support) Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/17 Re: [wwwdocs][Patch] gcc-15/changes: Fortran + offload (C++) update | project/gomp: GCC 15 update Tobias Burnus
• 2025/04/17 Re: [wwwdocs][Patch] gcc-15/changes: Fortran + offload (C++) update | project/gomp: GCC 15 update Gerald Pfeifer
• 2025/04/17 Re: [wwwdocs][Patch] gcc-15/changes: Fortran + offload (C++) update | project/gomp: GCC 15 update Gerald Pfeifer
• 2025/04/17 Re: [wwwdocs][Patch] gcc-15/changes: Fortran + offload (C++) update | project/gomp: GCC 15 update Andrew Stubbs
• 2025/04/17 [wwwdocs][Patch] gcc-15/changes: Fortran + offload (C++) update | project/gomp: GCC 15 update Tobias Burnus
• 2025/04/16 Re: Fortran 15.0.1 treats "shiftl" as impure Jerry D
• 2025/04/16 Re: Fortran 15.0.1 treats "shiftl" as impure ZAPART CHRISTOPHER ANDREW
• 2025/04/16 Re: Fortran 15.0.1 treats "shiftl" as impure ZAPART CHRISTOPHER ANDREW
• 2025/04/16 Re: Fortran 15.0.1 treats "shiftl" as impure Jerry D
• 2025/04/16 Re: Fortran 15.0.1 treats "shiftl" as impure Jerry D
• 2025/04/16 Re: Fortran 15.0.1 treats "shiftl" as impure Steve Kargl
• 2025/04/15 Fortran 15.0.1 treats "shiftl" as impure ZAPART CHRISTOPHER ANDREW
• 2025/04/15 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: pure subroutine with pure procedure as dummy [PR106948] Jerry D
• 2025/04/15 [PATCH] Fortran: pure subroutine with pure procedure as dummy [PR106948] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/04/15 Re: [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 0/5] Improve on Fortran 2018 teams support Jerry D
• 2025/04/15 Re: [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 0/5] Improve on Fortran 2018 teams support Jerry D
• 2025/04/14 Bogus rank and type mismatch errors with procedure pointer Andrew Benson
• 2025/04/13 Re: [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 0/5] Improve on Fortran 2018 teams support Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/13 Re: [Fortran, Patch, Team, 3/5] Update get_team, team_number and image_status to F2018 [PR88154, PR88960, PR97210, PR103001] Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/13 Re: [Fortran, Patch, Team, 3/5] Update get_team, team_number and image_status to F2018 [PR88154, PR88960, PR97210, PR103001] Jerry D
• 2025/04/13 Re: [patch, libgfortran] PR119502 Jerry D
• 2025/04/13 Re: F2008 and F2018 statuses on gfortran wiki Jerry D
• 2025/04/13 Re: [patch, libgfortran] PR119502 Thomas Koenig
• 2025/04/13 Re: [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 119669 Thomas Koenig
• 2025/04/13 F2008 and F2018 statuses on gfortran wiki Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/04/12 [patch, libgfortran] PR119502 Jerry D
• 2025/04/12 Re: Documentation for the REDUCE intrinsic Sandra Loosemore
• 2025/04/12 [PUSHED] Fortran: Add code gen for do, concurrent's LOCAL/LOCAL_INIT: Fix 'static_assert' [PR101602] Thomas Schwinge
• 2025/04/12 Documentation for the REDUCE intrinsic Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/04/11 Re: [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 119669 Harald Anlauf
• 2025/04/11 [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 119669 Thomas Koenig
• 2025/04/10 Re: GSoC[Fortran Runtime argument check ] Draft of Proposal and some doubts about the needs Gwen Fu
• 2025/04/10 [Fortran, Patch, Team, 2/5] Improve F2018 TEAM handling [PR87326, PR87556, PR88254, PR103896] Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/10 [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 5/5] Add teams support in image_index and num_images for F2018 Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/10 [Fortran, Patch, Team, 3/5] Update get_team, team_number and image_status to F2018 [PR88154, PR88960, PR97210, PR103001] Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/10 [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 1/5] Unify handling of STAT= and ERRMSG= optional arguments [PR87939] Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/10 [Fortran, Patch, Team, 4/5] Add team-support to this_image [PR87326] Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/10 [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 0/5] Improve on Fortran 2018 teams support Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/09 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix issue with impure elemental subroutine and interface [PR119656] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/04/09 Re: Is ASSOCIATE implemented correctly in gfortran? Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/09 Re: Is ASSOCIATE implemented correctly in gfortran? Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/04/09 Re: Is ASSOCIATE implemented correctly in gfortran? Mikael Morin
• 2025/04/08 Re: [Patch] Fortran: Add code gen for do,concurrent's LOCAL/LOCAL_INIT [PR101602] Jerry D
• 2025/04/08 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix issue with impure elemental subroutine and interface [PR119656] Jerry D
• 2025/04/08 [PATCH] Fortran: fix issue with impure elemental subroutine and interface [PR119656] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/04/08 [Patch] Fortran: Add code gen for do,concurrent's LOCAL/LOCAL_INIT [PR101602] Tobias Burnus
• 2025/04/08 Is ASSOCIATE implemented correctly in gfortran? Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/07 Re: GSoC[Fortran Runtime argument check ] Draft of Proposal and some doubts about the needs Steve Kargl
• 2025/04/07 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR119460 - gfortran.dg/reduce_1.f90 FAILs Christophe Lyon
• 2025/04/06 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR119460 - gfortran.dg/reduce_1.f90 FAILs Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/06 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR119460 - gfortran.dg/reduce_1.f90 FAILs Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/04/06 Re: GSoC[Fortran Runtime argument check ] Draft of Proposal and some doubts about the needs Gwen Fu
• 2025/04/06 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR119460 - gfortran.dg/reduce_1.f90 FAILs Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/06 Re: GSoC[Fortran Runtime argument check ] Draft of Proposal and some doubts about the needs Steve Kargl
• 2025/04/06 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR119460 - gfortran.dg/reduce_1.f90 FAILs H.J. Lu
• 2025/04/06 [Patch, fortran] PR119460 - gfortran.dg/reduce_1.f90 FAILs Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/04/05 GSoC 2025 - Draft Proposal for Fortran 2018/202x - RFC Yuao Ma
• 2025/04/05 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR119349, v1] Fix regression of polymorphic dummy sourced from array constructors. Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/04/05 Re: GSoC Fortran – 2018/202x – Inquiry About Project Scope Steve Kargl
• 2025/04/05 [PATCH] testsuite: Replace the cray_pointers_2.f90 no cycling hack with dg-skip-if Jakub Jelinek
• 2025/04/05 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR119349, v1] Fix regression of polymorphic dummy sourced from array constructors. Thomas Koenig
• 2025/04/05 GSoC[Fortran Runtime argument check ] Draft of Proposal and some doubts about the needs Gwen Fu
• 2025/04/05 GSoC Draft Proposal Submission: Fortran 2018/202x Yuao Ma
• 2025/04/04 Re: porting-to update request Steve Kargl
• 2025/04/04 Re: porting-to update request Sergey Fedorov
• 2025/04/04 Re: porting-to update request FX Coudert
• 2025/04/03 Re: porting-to update request NightStrike
• 2025/04/03 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR119380, v1] Fix freeing procedure pointers in components Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/01 GSoC 2025 - Updated Proposal for Fortran 2018/202x - RFC Yuao Ma
• 2025/03/31 Re: GSoC 2025 - Draft Proposal for Fortran 2018/202x - RFC Steve Kargl
• 2025/03/29 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR85836: Implement the F2018 reduce intrinsic H.J. Lu
• 2025/03/28 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix spelling of flag -fallow-invalid-boz Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/28 [PATCH] Fortran: fix spelling of flag -fallow-invalid-boz Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/28 Re: porting-to update request Steve Kargl
• 2025/03/28 Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Don't cycle through option list for gfortran.dg and libgomp.fortran dg-do run tests with -O in dg*options Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/28 Re: porting-to update request NightStrike
• 2025/03/28 Re: GSoC Fortran – 2018/202x – Inquiry About Project Scope Yuao Ma
• 2025/03/28 [PATCH] testsuite: Don't cycle through option list for gfortran.dg and libgomp.fortran dg-do run tests with -O in dg*options Jakub Jelinek
• 2025/03/27 Re: [Patch, Fortran] C prototypes for functions returning C function pointers Thomas Koenig
• 2025/03/27 Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Replace the cray_pointers_2.f90 no cycling hack with dg-skip-if Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/27 Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Replace the cray_pointers_2.f90 no cycling hack with dg-skip-if Jakub Jelinek
• 2025/03/27 Re: GSoC Fortran – 2018/202x – Inquiry About Project Scope Yuao Ma
• 2025/03/26 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix bogus recursion with DT default initialization [PR118796] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/26 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix bogus recursion with DT default initialization [PR118796] Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/03/26 [PATCH] Fortran: fix bogus recursion with DT default initialization [PR118796] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/26 Re: GSoC Fortran – 2018/202x – Inquiry About Project Scope Yuao Ma
• 2025/03/26 Re: GSoC Fortran – 2018/202x – Inquiry About Project Scope Steve Kargl
• 2025/03/26 Re: GSOC 2025 - Fortran - 2018/202x Martin Jambor
• 2025/03/26 [GSoC]Fortran – run-time argument checking Gwen Fu
• 2025/03/25 Re: porting-to update request Steve Kargl
• 2025/03/25 Re: [GSoC]Fortran – run-time argument checking Steve Kargl
• 2025/03/25 porting-to update request NightStrike
• 2025/03/25 [GSoC]Fortran – run-time argument checking Gwen Fu
• 2025/03/24 Re: [Patch, Fortran] C prototypes for functions returning C function pointers Steve Kargl
• 2025/03/24 Re: [Patch, Fortran] C prototypes for functions returning C function pointers Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/24 Re: Gsoc: Fortran-Do Concurrent Martin Jambor
• 2025/03/24 Re: [Patch, Fortran] C prototypes for functions returning C function pointers Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/24 Re: [Patch, Fortran] C prototypes for functions returning C function pointers Thomas Koenig
• 2025/03/24 [Patch, Fortran] C prototypes for functions returning C function pointers Thomas Koenig
• 2025/03/24 Re: GSoC Fortran – 2018/202x – Inquiry About Project Scope Steve Kargl
• 2025/03/24 Re: GSoC Fortran – 2018/202x – Inquiry About Project Scope Steve Kargl
• 2025/03/24 Re: GSoC Fortran – 2018/202x – Inquiry About Project Scope Janne Blomqvist
• 2025/03/24 GSoC Fortran – 2018/202x – Inquiry About Project Scope Yuao Ma
• 2025/03/24 Re: [COMMITTED] libgfortran/intrinsics: Fix build for targets with int32_t=long int Steve Kargl
• 2025/03/23 GSOC 2025 - Fortran - 2018/202x Yuao Ma
• 2025/03/23 [GSoC][Fortran – DO CONCURRENT] Seeking feedback/suggestions for project proposal Zhang lv
• 2025/03/23 Re: [COMMITTED] libgfortran/intrinsics: Fix build for targets with int32_t=long int Thomas Koenig
• 2025/03/23 Re: [COMMITTED] libgfortran/intrinsics: Fix build for targets with int32_t=long int Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/03/22 [COMMITTED] libgfortran/intrinsics: Fix build for targets with int32_t=long int Hans-Peter Nilsson
• 2025/03/21 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR119349, v1] Fix regression of polymorphic dummy sourced from array constructors. Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/03/21 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR119380, v1] Fix freeing procedure pointers in components Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/03/21 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR119380, v1] Fix freeing procedure pointers in components Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/03/21 [Fortran, Patch, PR119380, v1] Fix freeing procedure pointers in components Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/03/21 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR119349, v1] Fix regression of polymorphic dummy sourced from array constructors. Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/03/20 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR119349, v1] Fix regression of polymorphic dummy sourced from array constructors. Jerry D
• 2025/03/20 [Fortran, Patch, PR119349, v1] Fix regression of polymorphic dummy sourced from array constructors. Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/03/20 [GSoC] Fortran – run-time argument checking Gwen Fu
• 2025/03/19 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix bogus bounds check for reallocation on assignment [PR116706] Steve Kargl
• 2025/03/19 Bug 119380 - [12,13,14,15] Associate malloc error on selector with allocatable and procedure pointer Damian Rouson
• 2025/03/19 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix bogus bounds check for reallocation on assignment [PR116706] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/19 [PATCH] Fortran: fix bogus bounds check for reallocation on assignment [PR116706] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/19 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR119272, v1] Fix handling of class' component call in associate Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/03/19 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR85836: Implement the F2018 reduce intrinsic Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/03/19 Re: Bug 119349 [15 Regression] polymorphic array dummy argument with function result actual argument in elemental function Jerry D
• 2025/03/19 GSOC 2025 - Fortran - 2018/202x Yuao Ma
• 2025/03/19 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR119272, v1] Fix handling of class' component call in associate Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/03/19 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR85836: Implement the F2018 reduce intrinsic Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/03/19 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR119272, v1] Fix handling of class' component call in associate Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/03/19 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR119272, v1] Fix handling of class' component call in associate Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/03/18 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR119272, v1] Fix handling of class' component call in associate Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/18 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: check type-spec in ALLOCATE of dummy with assumed length [PR119338] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/17 Bug 119349 [15 Regression] polymorphic array dummy argument with function result actual argument in elemental function Damian Rouson
• 2025/03/17 [PATCH] Fortran: check type-spec in ALLOCATE of dummy with assumed length [PR119338] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/17 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: check type-spec in ALLOCATE of dummy with assumed length [PR119338] Jerry D
• 2025/03/17 Re: [GSoC][Fortran – DO CONCURRENT] Interest in 2025 GSoC – Fortran DO CONCURRENT Auto-Parallelization Martin Jambor
• 2025/03/17 Re: [GSoC] Proposal Discussion:Fortran – run-time argument checking Martin Jambor
• 2025/03/17 [committed] Move gfortran.dg/gomp/declare-variant-mod-1*.f90 to libgomp.fortran/ [PR115271] (was: [Patch] Fortran: Store OpenMP's 'declare variant' in module file [PR115271]) Tobias Burnus
• 2025/03/17 [Fortran, Patch, PR119272, v1] Fix handling of class' component call in associate Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/03/17 Re: gcc.gnu.org performance issues? Jonathan Wakely
• 2025/03/16 Re: [Patch] Fortran: Store OpenMP's 'declare variant' in module file [PR115271] H.J. Lu
• 2025/03/16 Re: gcc.gnu.org performance issues? Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/16 Re: gcc.gnu.org performance issues? Jonathan Wakely
• 2025/03/16 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix bogus dependency check in ALLOCATE statement [PR60560] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/16 Re: gcc.gnu.org performance issues? Mark Wielaard
• 2025/03/16 Re: gcc.gnu.org performance issues? Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/16 Re: gcc.gnu.org performance issues? Mark Wielaard
• 2025/03/16 Re: gcc.gnu.org performance issues? Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/16 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR85836: Implement the F2018 reduce intrinsic Jerry D
• 2025/03/16 [Patch, fortran] PR85836: Implement the F2018 reduce intrinsic Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/03/16 Re: [patch, changes.html] UNSIGNED, -fc-prototypes*, -Wexternal-interface-mismatch Thomas Koenig
• 2025/03/16 Re: [patch, changes.html] UNSIGNED, -fc-prototypes*, -Wexternal-interface-mismatch Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/03/15 Re: [Patch] Fortran: Store OpenMP's 'declare variant' in module file [PR115271] Tobias Burnus
• 2025/03/15 Fwd: GCC GSoC 2025: Call for project ideas and mentors Jerry D
• 2025/03/15 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR107143, v1] Fix gimplification error in forall' pointer remapping Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/03/15 [Patch] Fortran: Store OpenMP's 'declare variant' in module file [PR115271] Tobias Burnus
• 2025/03/15 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix bogus dependency check in ALLOCATE statement [PR60560] Thomas Koenig
• 2025/03/15 [patch, changes.html] UNSIGNED, -fc-prototypes*, -Wexternal-interface-mismatch Thomas Koenig
• 2025/03/15 [PATCH] Fortran: fix bogus dependency check in ALLOCATE statement [PR60560] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/15 Re: [Patch] Fortran: Store OpenMP's 'declare variant' in module file [PR115271] Tobias Burnus
• 2025/03/15 Re: [Patch] Fortran: Store OpenMP's 'declare variant' in module file [PR115271] Thomas Koenig
• 2025/03/13 [PATCH, part2, committed] Fortran: improve checking of substring bounds [PR119118] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/12 Regression? Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 119078, putting a procedure in an abstract interface into global namespace Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/03/12 Re: Regression? Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 119078, putting a procedure in an abstract interface into global namespace Thomas Koenig
• 2025/03/12 Re: Regression? Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 119078, putting a procedure in an abstract interface into global namespace Thomas Koenig
• 2025/03/12 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR98903, v1] Add parsing and code gen for TEAM_NUMBER in coindexes. Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/03/11 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR98903, v1] Add parsing and code gen for TEAM_NUMBER in coindexes. Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/11 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: reject SAVE of a COMMON in a BLOCK construct [PR119199] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/11 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR107143, v1] Fix gimplification error in forall' pointer remapping Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/03/11 Re: [GSoC][Fortran – DO CONCURRENT] Interest in 2025 GSoC – Fortran DO CONCURRENT Auto-Parallelization Jerry D
• 2025/03/11 Re: [Ping, Patch, www-docs, Fortran, Coarray-ABI] Announce coarray-ABI changes in gfortran-15 Jerry D
• 2025/03/11 Re: [Ping, Patch, www-docs, Fortran, Coarray-ABI] Announce coarray-ABI changes in gfortran-15 Jerry D
• 2025/03/11 Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 119078, putting a procedure in an abstract interface into global namespace Thomas Koenig
• 2025/03/11 [Fortran, Patch, PR98903, v1] Add parsing and code gen for TEAM_NUMBER in coindexes. Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/03/11 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: reject SAVE of a COMMON in a BLOCK construct [PR119199] Thomas Koenig
• 2025/03/11 Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 119078, putting a procedure in an abstract interface into global namespace Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/03/11 Re: [Ping, Patch, www-docs, Fortran, Coarray-ABI] Announce coarray-ABI changes in gfortran-15 Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/03/11 Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 119078, putting a procedure in an abstract interface into global namespace Thomas Koenig

• Earlier messages