fortran  

Messages by Date

• 2025/05/15 ICE in gfc_trans_call Andrew Benson
• 2025/05/15 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: default-initialization and functions returning derived type[PR85750] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/05/15 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: default-initialization and functions returning derived type[PR85750] Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/05/15 [PATCH] Fortran: default-initialization and functions returning derived type[PR85750] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/05/14 Re: [PATCH] gcc: add trigonometric pi-based functions as gcc builtins Joseph Myers
• 2025/05/14 [Patch] OpenMP/Fortran: Fix allocatable-component mapping of derived-type array comps Tobias Burnus
• 2025/05/14 Re: [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 120139, missing asterisk on prototype with -fc-prototypes Thomas Koenig
• 2025/05/14 [PATCH] gcc: add trigonometric pi-based functions as gcc builtins Yuao Ma
• 2025/05/14 Re: [PATCH] gcc: add trigonometric pi-based functions as gcc builtins Joseph Myers
• 2025/05/14 [PATCH] gcc: add trigonometric pi-based functions as gcc builtins Yuao Ma
• 2025/05/14 [committed] Fortran: Fix mpfr_tanu use in gfc_simplify_cotand with mpfr 4.2.0+ [PR120225] (was: PING – Re: [Patch] Fortran: Use mpfr_sinu etc. with mpfr 4.2.0+ for degree trigonometric functions [PR120225]) Tobias Burnus
• 2025/05/13 Re: PING – Re: [Patch] Fortran: Use mpfr_sinu etc. with mpfr 4.2.0+ for degree trigonometric functions [PR120225] FX Coudert
• 2025/05/13 Re: [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 120139, missing asterisk on prototype with -fc-prototypes Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/05/13 Re: [patch, Fortran] Fix 15/16 regression when non-interoperable types were dumped Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/05/13 PING – Re: [Patch] Fortran: Use mpfr_sinu etc. with mpfr 4.2.0+ for degree trigonometric functions [PR120225] Tobias Burnus
• 2025/05/13 Re: [PATCH] fortran: map atand(y, x) to atan2d(y, x) [PR113413] Tobias Burnus
• 2025/05/13 [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 120139, missing asterisk on prototype with -fc-prototypes Thomas Koenig
• 2025/05/13 [patch, Fortran] Fix 15/16 regression when non-interoperable types were dumped Thomas Koenig
• 2025/05/13 Re: [PATCH] libfortran: Fix up _gfortran_s{max,min}loc1_{4,8,16}_s{1,4} [PR120191] Tobias Burnus
• 2025/05/13 Re: [PATCH] libfortran: Fix up _gfortran_s{max,min}loc2_{4,8,16}_s{1,4} [PR120191] Tobias Burnus
• 2025/05/13 Re: [PATCH] libfortran: Fix up _gfortran_{, m, s}findloc2_s{1, 4} [PR120196] Tobias Burnus
• 2025/05/13 Re: [PATCH] fortran, v2: Fix up minloc/maxloc lowering [PR120191] Tobias Burnus
• 2025/05/13 [PATCH] libfortran: Fix up _gfortran_{, m, s}findloc2_s{1, 4} [PR120196] Jakub Jelinek
• 2025/05/12 Re: aarch64-w64-mingw32-gfortran: just checking Cottrell, Allin
• 2025/05/12 Re: aarch64-w64-mingw32-gfortran: just checking Iain Sandoe
• 2025/05/12 aarch64-w64-mingw32-gfortran: just checking Allin Cottrell
• 2025/05/12 [PATCH] fortran: map atand(y, x) to atan2d(y, x) [PR113413] Yuao Ma
• 2025/05/12 Re: [Patch] Fortran: Use mpfr_sinu etc. with mpfr 4.2.0+ for degree trigonometric functions [PR120225] Richard Biener
• 2025/05/12 [Patch] Fortran: Use mpfr_sinu etc. with mpfr 4.2.0+ for degree trigonometric functions [PR120225] Tobias Burnus
• 2025/05/12 [PATCH] libfortran: Fix up _gfortran_s{max,min}loc1_{4,8,16}_s{1,4} [PR120191] Jakub Jelinek
• 2025/05/12 [PATCH] libfortran: Fix up _gfortran_s{max,min}loc2_{4,8,16}_s{1,4} [PR120191] Jakub Jelinek
• 2025/05/11 [PATCH] fortran, v2: Fix up minloc/maxloc lowering [PR120191] Jakub Jelinek
• 2025/05/11 Re: Testing for prototypes generated from Fortran Richard Biener
• 2025/05/11 Re: Testing for prototypes generated from Fortran Ben Boeckel
• 2025/05/11 Re: Testing for prototypes generated from Fortran Harald Anlauf
• 2025/05/11 Re: [PATCH] fortran: map atand(y, x) to atan2d(y, x) Tobias Burnus
• 2025/05/11 [PATCH] fortran: map atand(y, x) to atan2d(y, x) Yuao Ma
• 2025/05/11 Re: Testing for prototypes generated from Fortran Thomas Koenig
• 2025/05/11 Re: Testing for prototypes generated from Fortran Harald Anlauf
• 2025/05/11 Testing for prototypes generated from Fortran Thomas Koenig
• 2025/05/10 Re: [parch, fortran] Fix PR 120163, 15/16 regression Thomas Koenig
• 2025/05/10 Re: [PING] [PATCH] Fortran: fix passing of inquiry ref of complex array to TRANSFER [PR102891] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/05/10 Re: [PING] [PATCH] Fortran: fix passing of inquiry ref of complex array to TRANSFER [PR102891] Jerry D
• 2025/05/10 [PING] [PATCH] Fortran: fix passing of inquiry ref of complex array to TRANSFER [PR102891] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/05/10 Re: [parch, fortran] Fix PR 120163, 15/16 regression Harald Anlauf
• 2025/05/10 Re: [PATCH, fortran] Fix simple typo in libgfortran Tobias Burnus
• 2025/05/10 [PATCH, fortran] Fix simple typo in libgfortran Yuao Ma
• 2025/05/10 Re: [PATCH, fortran] Fix simple typo in libgfortran Tobias Burnus
• 2025/05/10 [PATCH, fortran] Fix simple typo in libgfortran Yuao Ma
• 2025/05/10 [parch, fortran] Fix PR 120163, 15/16 regression Thomas Koenig
• 2025/05/10 Re: [PATCH, fortran] Fix simple typo in libgfortran Thomas Koenig
• 2025/05/10 Re: [PATCH] fortran: Fix up minloc/maxloc lowering [PR120191] Tobias Burnus
• 2025/05/10 [PATCH, fortran] Fix simple typo in libgfortran Yuao Ma
• 2025/05/10 Re: [PATCH] fortran: Fix debug info for unsigned(kind=1) and unsigned(kind=4) [PR120193] Thomas Koenig
• 2025/05/09 [PATCH] fortran: Fix debug info for unsigned(kind=1) and unsigned(kind=4) [PR120193] Jakub Jelinek
• 2025/05/09 [PATCH] fortran: Fix up minloc/maxloc lowering [PR120191] Jakub Jelinek
• 2025/05/09 PR fortran/120191 Daniil Kochergin
• 2025/05/08 [PATCH, committed] Fortran: parsing issue with DO CONCURRENT; ENDDO on same line [PR120179] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/05/07 Re: [PATCH] libfortran: Fix up maxval/maxloc for UNSIGNED [PR120158] Thomas Koenig
• 2025/05/07 [PATCH] libfortran: Fix up maxval/maxloc for UNSIGNED [PR120158] Jakub Jelinek
• 2025/05/07 Re: [PATCH] libfortran: Add 5 missing UNSIGNED symbols [PR120153] Thomas Koenig
• 2025/05/07 Re: [PATCH] libfortran: Readd 15 accidentally removed libgfortran symbols [PR120152] Thomas Koenig
• 2025/05/07 [PATCH] libfortran: Add 5 missing UNSIGNED symbols [PR120153] Jakub Jelinek
• 2025/05/07 [PATCH] libfortran: Readd 15 accidentally removed libgfortran symbols [PR120152] Jakub Jelinek
• 2025/05/06 Re: [patch, fortram] Bug 120049 - ICE when using IS_C_ASSOCIATED () Jerry D
• 2025/05/06 [PATCH] Fortran: fix passing of inquiry ref of complex array to TRANSFER [PR102891] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/05/06 Re: Breakage on specifics_1.f90 Toon Moene
• 2025/05/06 Re: [patch, fortram] Bug 120049 - ICE when using IS_C_ASSOCIATED () Steve Kargl
• 2025/05/06 Re: [patch, fortram] Bug 120049 - ICE when using IS_C_ASSOCIATED () Harald Anlauf
• 2025/05/06 Re: Breakage on specifics_1.f90 Sam James
• 2025/05/06 Breakage on specifics_1.f90 Jerry D
• 2025/05/06 Re: [patch, fortram] Bug 120049 - ICE when using IS_C_ASSOCIATED () Jerry D
• 2025/05/06 Re: [patch, fortram] Bug 120049 - ICE when using IS_C_ASSOCIATED () Jerry D
• 2025/05/06 Re: [patch, fortram] Bug 120049 - ICE when using IS_C_ASSOCIATED () Steve Kargl
• 2025/05/06 Re: [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 119928, rejects-valid 15/16 regression Thomas Koenig
• 2025/05/06 Re: [patch, fortram] Bug 120049 - ICE when using IS_C_ASSOCIATED () Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/05/05 [patch, fortram] Bug 120049 - ICE when using IS_C_ASSOCIATED () Jerry D
• 2025/05/04 Re: [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 119928, rejects-valid 15/16 regression Harald Anlauf
• 2025/05/04 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: array subreferences and components of derived types [PR119986] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/05/04 Re: [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 119928, rejects-valid 15/16 regression Thomas Koenig
• 2025/05/04 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: array subreferences and components of derived types [PR119986] Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/05/03 [PATCH] Fortran: array subreferences and components of derived types [PR119986] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/05/03 Re: [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 119928, rejects-valid 15/16 regression Thomas Koenig
• 2025/05/03 Re: [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 119928, rejects-valid 15/16 regression Harald Anlauf
• 2025/05/03 [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 119928, rejects-valid 15/16 regression Thomas Koenig
• 2025/05/03 [patch, wwwdocs, committed] Fix option name in gcc15/changes.html Thomas Koenig
• 2025/05/01 [Patch fortran] PR119948 - Source allocation of pure function result rejected Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/04/25 Source allocation of pure function result rejected Damian Rouson
• 2025/04/25 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix procedure pointer handling with -fcheck=pointer [PR102900] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/04/24 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix procedure pointer handling with -fcheck=pointer [PR102900] Jerry D
• 2025/04/24 [PATCH] Fortran: fix procedure pointer handling with -fcheck=pointer [PR102900] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/04/23 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR119200, v1] Use correct locus while check()ing coarray functions. Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/23 [committed] OpenMP: Add libgomp.fortran/target-enter-data-8.f90 Tobias Burnus
• 2025/04/22 Re: [patch fortran] PR119836 [15/16 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT Jakub Jelinek
• 2025/04/22 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR119200, v1] Use correct locus while check()ing coarray functions. Harald Anlauf
• 2025/04/22 Re: [patch fortran] PR119836 [15/16 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT Jerry D
• 2025/04/22 [Fortran, Patch, PR119200, v1] Use correct locus while check()ing coarray functions. Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/22 Re: [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 6/5] Various fixes for F2018 teams support Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/18 Re: [patch fortran] PR119836 [15/16 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT Jerry D
• 2025/04/18 Re: [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 6/5] Various fixes for F2018 teams support Jerry D
• 2025/04/18 [patch fortran] PR119836 [15/16 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT Jerry D
• 2025/04/18 Re: Fortran 15.0.1 treats "shiftl" as impure ZAPART CHRISTOPHER ANDREW
• 2025/04/18 Re: Fortran 15.0.1 treats "shiftl" as impure Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/04/18 Re: [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 6/5] Various fixes for F2018 teams support (was: Re: [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 0/5] Improve on Fortran 2018 teams support) Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/04/18 Re: [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 6/5] Various fixes for F2018 teams support Jerry D
• 2025/04/18 Re: [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 6/5] Various fixes for F2018 teams support Jerry D
• 2025/04/18 Re: [Patch] Fortran/OpenMP: Support automatic mapping allocatable components (deep mapping) Thomas Schwinge
• 2025/04/17 Re: 15 is now at or very near release Andrew Pinski
• 2025/04/17 15 is now at or very near release Jerry D
• 2025/04/17 [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 6/5] Various fixes for F2018 teams support (was: Re: [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 0/5] Improve on Fortran 2018 teams support) Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/17 Re: [wwwdocs][Patch] gcc-15/changes: Fortran + offload (C++) update | project/gomp: GCC 15 update Tobias Burnus
• 2025/04/17 Re: [wwwdocs][Patch] gcc-15/changes: Fortran + offload (C++) update | project/gomp: GCC 15 update Gerald Pfeifer
• 2025/04/17 Re: [wwwdocs][Patch] gcc-15/changes: Fortran + offload (C++) update | project/gomp: GCC 15 update Gerald Pfeifer
• 2025/04/17 Re: [wwwdocs][Patch] gcc-15/changes: Fortran + offload (C++) update | project/gomp: GCC 15 update Andrew Stubbs
• 2025/04/17 [wwwdocs][Patch] gcc-15/changes: Fortran + offload (C++) update | project/gomp: GCC 15 update Tobias Burnus
• 2025/04/16 Re: Fortran 15.0.1 treats "shiftl" as impure Jerry D
• 2025/04/16 Re: Fortran 15.0.1 treats "shiftl" as impure ZAPART CHRISTOPHER ANDREW
• 2025/04/16 Re: Fortran 15.0.1 treats "shiftl" as impure ZAPART CHRISTOPHER ANDREW
• 2025/04/16 Re: Fortran 15.0.1 treats "shiftl" as impure Jerry D
• 2025/04/16 Re: Fortran 15.0.1 treats "shiftl" as impure Jerry D
• 2025/04/16 Re: Fortran 15.0.1 treats "shiftl" as impure Steve Kargl
• 2025/04/15 Fortran 15.0.1 treats "shiftl" as impure ZAPART CHRISTOPHER ANDREW
• 2025/04/15 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: pure subroutine with pure procedure as dummy [PR106948] Jerry D
• 2025/04/15 [PATCH] Fortran: pure subroutine with pure procedure as dummy [PR106948] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/04/15 Re: [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 0/5] Improve on Fortran 2018 teams support Jerry D
• 2025/04/15 Re: [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 0/5] Improve on Fortran 2018 teams support Jerry D
• 2025/04/14 Bogus rank and type mismatch errors with procedure pointer Andrew Benson
• 2025/04/13 Re: [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 0/5] Improve on Fortran 2018 teams support Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/13 Re: [Fortran, Patch, Team, 3/5] Update get_team, team_number and image_status to F2018 [PR88154, PR88960, PR97210, PR103001] Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/13 Re: [Fortran, Patch, Team, 3/5] Update get_team, team_number and image_status to F2018 [PR88154, PR88960, PR97210, PR103001] Jerry D
• 2025/04/13 Re: [patch, libgfortran] PR119502 Jerry D
• 2025/04/13 Re: F2008 and F2018 statuses on gfortran wiki Jerry D
• 2025/04/13 Re: [patch, libgfortran] PR119502 Thomas Koenig
• 2025/04/13 Re: [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 119669 Thomas Koenig
• 2025/04/13 F2008 and F2018 statuses on gfortran wiki Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/04/12 [patch, libgfortran] PR119502 Jerry D
• 2025/04/12 Re: Documentation for the REDUCE intrinsic Sandra Loosemore
• 2025/04/12 [PUSHED] Fortran: Add code gen for do, concurrent's LOCAL/LOCAL_INIT: Fix 'static_assert' [PR101602] Thomas Schwinge
• 2025/04/12 Documentation for the REDUCE intrinsic Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/04/11 Re: [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 119669 Harald Anlauf
• 2025/04/11 [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 119669 Thomas Koenig
• 2025/04/10 Re: GSoC[Fortran Runtime argument check ] Draft of Proposal and some doubts about the needs Gwen Fu
• 2025/04/10 [Fortran, Patch, Team, 2/5] Improve F2018 TEAM handling [PR87326, PR87556, PR88254, PR103896] Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/10 [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 5/5] Add teams support in image_index and num_images for F2018 Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/10 [Fortran, Patch, Team, 3/5] Update get_team, team_number and image_status to F2018 [PR88154, PR88960, PR97210, PR103001] Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/10 [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 1/5] Unify handling of STAT= and ERRMSG= optional arguments [PR87939] Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/10 [Fortran, Patch, Team, 4/5] Add team-support to this_image [PR87326] Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/10 [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 0/5] Improve on Fortran 2018 teams support Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/09 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix issue with impure elemental subroutine and interface [PR119656] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/04/09 Re: Is ASSOCIATE implemented correctly in gfortran? Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/09 Re: Is ASSOCIATE implemented correctly in gfortran? Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/04/09 Re: Is ASSOCIATE implemented correctly in gfortran? Mikael Morin
• 2025/04/08 Re: [Patch] Fortran: Add code gen for do,concurrent's LOCAL/LOCAL_INIT [PR101602] Jerry D
• 2025/04/08 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix issue with impure elemental subroutine and interface [PR119656] Jerry D
• 2025/04/08 [PATCH] Fortran: fix issue with impure elemental subroutine and interface [PR119656] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/04/08 [Patch] Fortran: Add code gen for do,concurrent's LOCAL/LOCAL_INIT [PR101602] Tobias Burnus
• 2025/04/08 Is ASSOCIATE implemented correctly in gfortran? Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/07 Re: GSoC[Fortran Runtime argument check ] Draft of Proposal and some doubts about the needs Steve Kargl
• 2025/04/07 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR119460 - gfortran.dg/reduce_1.f90 FAILs Christophe Lyon
• 2025/04/06 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR119460 - gfortran.dg/reduce_1.f90 FAILs Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/06 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR119460 - gfortran.dg/reduce_1.f90 FAILs Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/04/06 Re: GSoC[Fortran Runtime argument check ] Draft of Proposal and some doubts about the needs Gwen Fu
• 2025/04/06 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR119460 - gfortran.dg/reduce_1.f90 FAILs Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/06 Re: GSoC[Fortran Runtime argument check ] Draft of Proposal and some doubts about the needs Steve Kargl
• 2025/04/06 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR119460 - gfortran.dg/reduce_1.f90 FAILs H.J. Lu
• 2025/04/06 [Patch, fortran] PR119460 - gfortran.dg/reduce_1.f90 FAILs Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/04/05 GSoC 2025 - Draft Proposal for Fortran 2018/202x - RFC Yuao Ma
• 2025/04/05 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR119349, v1] Fix regression of polymorphic dummy sourced from array constructors. Paul Richard Thomas
• 2025/04/05 Re: GSoC Fortran – 2018/202x – Inquiry About Project Scope Steve Kargl
• 2025/04/05 [PATCH] testsuite: Replace the cray_pointers_2.f90 no cycling hack with dg-skip-if Jakub Jelinek
• 2025/04/05 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR119349, v1] Fix regression of polymorphic dummy sourced from array constructors. Thomas Koenig
• 2025/04/05 GSoC[Fortran Runtime argument check ] Draft of Proposal and some doubts about the needs Gwen Fu
• 2025/04/05 GSoC Draft Proposal Submission: Fortran 2018/202x Yuao Ma
• 2025/04/04 Re: porting-to update request Steve Kargl
• 2025/04/04 Re: porting-to update request Sergey Fedorov
• 2025/04/04 Re: porting-to update request FX Coudert
• 2025/04/03 Re: porting-to update request NightStrike
• 2025/04/03 Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR119380, v1] Fix freeing procedure pointers in components Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/04/01 GSoC 2025 - Updated Proposal for Fortran 2018/202x - RFC Yuao Ma
• 2025/03/31 Re: GSoC 2025 - Draft Proposal for Fortran 2018/202x - RFC Steve Kargl
• 2025/03/29 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR85836: Implement the F2018 reduce intrinsic H.J. Lu
• 2025/03/28 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix spelling of flag -fallow-invalid-boz Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/28 [PATCH] Fortran: fix spelling of flag -fallow-invalid-boz Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/28 Re: porting-to update request Steve Kargl
• 2025/03/28 Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Don't cycle through option list for gfortran.dg and libgomp.fortran dg-do run tests with -O in dg*options Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/28 Re: porting-to update request NightStrike
• 2025/03/28 Re: GSoC Fortran – 2018/202x – Inquiry About Project Scope Yuao Ma
• 2025/03/28 [PATCH] testsuite: Don't cycle through option list for gfortran.dg and libgomp.fortran dg-do run tests with -O in dg*options Jakub Jelinek
• 2025/03/27 Re: [Patch, Fortran] C prototypes for functions returning C function pointers Thomas Koenig
• 2025/03/27 Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Replace the cray_pointers_2.f90 no cycling hack with dg-skip-if Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/27 Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Replace the cray_pointers_2.f90 no cycling hack with dg-skip-if Jakub Jelinek
• 2025/03/27 Re: GSoC Fortran – 2018/202x – Inquiry About Project Scope Yuao Ma
• 2025/03/26 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix bogus recursion with DT default initialization [PR118796] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/26 Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix bogus recursion with DT default initialization [PR118796] Andre Vehreschild
• 2025/03/26 [PATCH] Fortran: fix bogus recursion with DT default initialization [PR118796] Harald Anlauf
• 2025/03/26 Re: GSoC Fortran – 2018/202x – Inquiry About Project Scope Yuao Ma
• 2025/03/26 Re: GSoC Fortran – 2018/202x – Inquiry About Project Scope Steve Kargl
• 2025/03/26 Re: GSOC 2025 - Fortran - 2018/202x Martin Jambor
• 2025/03/26 [GSoC]Fortran – run-time argument checking Gwen Fu
• 2025/03/25 Re: porting-to update request Steve Kargl

• Earlier messages