Hi Jerry and Andre, Thank you for this splendid effort. The patch makes coarray fortran so accessible that even I have had a go! As far as I can tell, all the F2018 extensions work as advertised.
The ease of use is important in an era, in which even relatively low cost systems such as mine can have 20 CPUs, and will enable an introduction to coarrays. As you are aware, I cannot do anything to help at present. However, once back I will continue stress testing and will help with documentation, especially on the wiki. Regards Paul On Wed, 25 Feb 2026, 09:53 Jerry D, <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/25/26 5:53 AM, Toon Moene wrote: > > On 2/24/26 23:06, Toon Moene wrote: > > > >> On 2/24/26 23:03, Jerry D wrote: > >> > >>> Ref: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2026-February/063551.html > >>> > >>> See attached. > >>> > >>> Awaiting approval. > >>> > >>> This is the last one. > >> > >> Thanks, Jerry for this arduous work. I received all of them, in order, > so I > >> will work to test them tomorrow. > > > > The test completed: > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2026-February/870199.html > > > > One small patch difference: > > > > patching file gcc/fortran/resolve.cc > > Hunk #1 succeeded at 14271 (offset 7 lines). > > > > My "random-weather" test program functions as previously. > > > > The "locks" test program: > > > > (export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=~/compilers/install/gcc/lib64:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH; > time ./ > > a.out) > > Expected: 64 Found: 64 > > Expected: 640 Found: 640 > > Expected: 6400 Found: 6400 > > Expected: 64000 Found: 64000 > > Expected: 640000 Found: 640000 > > Expected: 6400000 Found: 6400000 > > > > real 0m3.349s > > user 0m4.431s > > sys 3m17.081s > > > > Looks great, all together ! > > > > Kind regards, > > > > I will push this tomorrow morning if no RM objections. > > Best regards to all, > > Jerry >
