Pushed, thankypu all for your support, reviews, testing, and patience.
Best regards,
Jerry
$ git pull --rebase
remote: Enumerating objects: 613, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (605/605), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (298/298), done.
remote: Total 299 (delta 245), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
Receiving objects: 100% (299/299), 117.89 KiB | 1.21 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (245/245), completed with 134 local objects.
From git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc
e0b70284cfa..13a53660180 master -> origin/master
c59dcc612d7..441b4847267 releases/gcc-13 -> origin/releases/gcc-13
f046752d2e9..c80b51b93a1 releases/gcc-14 -> origin/releases/gcc-14
0cba8001546..4886dd899bb releases/gcc-15 -> origin/releases/gcc-15
e0b70284cfa..13a53660180 trunk -> origin/trunk
Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/master.
$ git push
Enumerating objects: 270, done.
Counting objects: 100% (270/270), done.
Delta compression using up to 16 threads
Compressing objects: 100% (204/204), done.
Writing objects: 100% (225/225), 121.96 KiB | 8.13 MiB/s, done.
Total 225 (delta 168), reused 46 (delta 21), pack-reused 0 (from 0)
remote: Resolving deltas: 100% (168/168), completed with 39 local objects.
To ssh://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git
13a53660180..132139c00a8 master -> master
On 2/25/26 11:38 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
Hi Jerry and Andre,
Thank you for this splendid effort. The patch makes coarray fortran so
accessible that even I have had a go! As far as I can tell, all the F2018
extensions work as advertised.
The ease of use is important in an era, in which even relatively low cost
systems such as mine can have 20 CPUs, and will enable an introduction to coarrays.
As you are aware, I cannot do anything to help at present. However, once back I
will continue stress testing and will help with documentation, especially on the
wiki.
Regards
Paul
On Wed, 25 Feb 2026, 09:53 Jerry D, <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 2/25/26 5:53 AM, Toon Moene wrote:
> On 2/24/26 23:06, Toon Moene wrote:
>
>> On 2/24/26 23:03, Jerry D wrote:
>>
>>> Ref: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2026-February/063551.html
<https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2026-February/063551.html>
>>>
>>> See attached.
>>>
>>> Awaiting approval.
>>>
>>> This is the last one.
>>
>> Thanks, Jerry for this arduous work. I received all of them, in order,
so I
>> will work to test them tomorrow.
>
> The test completed:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2026-February/870199.html
<https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2026-February/870199.html>
>
> One small patch difference:
>
> patching file gcc/fortran/resolve.cc
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 14271 (offset 7 lines).
>
> My "random-weather" test program functions as previously.
>
> The "locks" test program:
>
> (export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=~/compilers/install/gcc/lib64:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH;
time ./
> a.out)
> Expected: 64 Found: 64
> Expected: 640 Found: 640
> Expected: 6400 Found: 6400
> Expected: 64000 Found: 64000
> Expected: 640000 Found: 640000
> Expected: 6400000 Found: 6400000
>
> real 0m3.349s
> user 0m4.431s
> sys 3m17.081s
>
> Looks great, all together !
>
> Kind regards,
>
I will push this tomorrow morning if no RM objections.
Best regards to all,
Jerry
