So... is there anybody at apache flex that can follow the flash runtime evolution??? I mean improving future apache flex compiler, because the runtime seems to be every day more and more far away from the apache flex way and I feel a little bit scared.
2012/10/18 Thibault Imbert <timb...@adobe.com> > Hi Clint, > > No, we have no plans. > > Thibault Imbert | sr. product manager gaming (Graphics, Language, VM, > Compiler) | Monocle | adobe systems > gaming.adobe.com <http://gaming.adobe.com/> | bytearray.org > <http://bytearray.org/> | @thibault_imbert > > > > > > > On 10/17/12 11:04 PM, "Clint Modien" <cl...@vectorscape.com> wrote: > > >This obviously begs the questionŠ does Adobe plan on donating any changes > >to ASC 2.0 back to Apache Flex? > > > >On Oct 15, 2012, at 5:28 PM, Thibault Imbert <timb...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi Mike, > >> > >> Yes, we wanted to give you access to the compiler as soon as possible so > >> we decided to donate the final version of the compiler (aka Falcon) with > >> Flex (MXML) support that you guys could contribute to it and shape > >>Falcon > >> the way Flex developers decide to. > >> > >> ASC 2.0 purpose was gaming focused, hence why we decided to pursue the > >> development on our side. Given that its audience today is different we > >> don't want to have gaming requirements for the compiler get in the way > >>of > >> requirements from Flex developers. > >> > >> Thibault Imbert | sr. product manager gaming (Graphics, Language, VM, > >> Compiler) | Monocle | adobe systems > >> gaming.adobe.com <http://gaming.adobe.com/> | bytearray.org > >> <http://bytearray.org/> | @thibault_imbert > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 10/15/12 3:20 PM, "labri...@digitalprimates.net" > >> <labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote: > >> > >>>> Yes, ASC 2.0 is essentially a fork of Falcon. (More accurately, Falcon > >>>> was branched off back in the summer and the packages were renamed from > >>>> com.adobe.flash to org.apache.flex.) As far >as I know, I'll be > >>>> integrating these bugfixes into Falcon at some point. > >>> > >>> So, essentially, adobe donated a snap shot in time of falcon and is > >>> continuing development in a closed source manner. Is this accurate? > >>> > >>> Mike > >>> > >> > > > >
