On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 4:25 PM, James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 5/16/2018 11:07 AM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: >> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Derek Buitenhuis >> <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> This is a little rambling / stream of thought, but take it as you will, >>> and perhaps some discussion or change comes of it. Or, more likely, personal >>> attacks, flames, and no change. Or 1 few will reply and then the thread will >>> die and people will go on like it never happened. Sorry to be pessimistic, >>> but history speaks for itself. >> >> 48 hours later and: >> - Some votes for repealing the CoC. >> - One vote for keeping > > I think the issue is not the lack of clear enforcement rules, but a lack > of a proactive enforcer, be it a person or a body. The CoC has done > nothing but give people something to say when they want to be passive > aggressive in a discussion. > Changing it to a more strict one like Videolan's will not affect that. > > This lack of interest you mentioned is exactly the issue. If it all > depends on the coordinated action and involvement of a dozen or so > developers, then nothing will happen. As i said, the one time action was > called for a developer's behavior, no voter showed up. > > I'm up for keeping it or making it stricter. But it needs to be > enforced. So how do we get a dozen or so people to stop looking away > every time someone is a dick in a thread? >
Maybe the solution should be something that does not require all those people to convene everytime there is some petty trolling going on again. There is a big difference between "not caring" and not wanting to get involved with this on a daily basis, even if you guys seem to throw all of those into the same pile. - Hendrik _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
