On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 7:50 PM, Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So, I present to you two possible options: > > 1. Implement a formal CoC enforcement system. This has been mostly > copypasted > from VideoLAN's, and is meant as more of a blueprint. This will no > doubt > be controversial. > 2. Remove the CoC. If you're not going to enforce it, ever, there is > literally > no point in having one. I know some members of this community object > to the > very notion of a CoC, so this should please them, I am sure. > > I'm sure this will be a civil discussion.
Hi, Just voicing my opinion as a community member. Out of these two examples (which they are) I'm preferring nr1, the CoC should be improved (or a VideoLAN style one adopted) and we should make an effort to try and minimize the amount of rudeness and bad behaviour in this project. Removing the CoC sounds to me like either we don't agree with the notion of being civil with each other, or that we just can't as a community handle civil discourse. Both of those alternatives make me rather sad. I know a lot of people want to just focus on the technical parts, and in a perfect world we would be able to not have personal problems - but I think we don't have a healthy community right now. Of course, I am also fully aware that fixing the issues is going to take way more than just applying a more specific CoC. Best regards, Jan _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
