On 16.05.2018 17:14, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 4:25 PM, James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 5/16/2018 11:07 AM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: >>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Derek Buitenhuis >>> <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> This is a little rambling / stream of thought, but take it as you will, >>>> and perhaps some discussion or change comes of it. Or, more likely, >>>> personal >>>> attacks, flames, and no change. Or 1 few will reply and then the thread >>>> will >>>> die and people will go on like it never happened. Sorry to be pessimistic, >>>> but history speaks for itself. >>> 48 hours later and: >>> - Some votes for repealing the CoC. >>> - One vote for keeping >> I think the issue is not the lack of clear enforcement rules, but a lack >> of a proactive enforcer, be it a person or a body. The CoC has done >> nothing but give people something to say when they want to be passive >> aggressive in a discussion. >> Changing it to a more strict one like Videolan's will not affect that. >> >> This lack of interest you mentioned is exactly the issue. If it all >> depends on the coordinated action and involvement of a dozen or so >> developers, then nothing will happen. As i said, the one time action was >> called for a developer's behavior, no voter showed up. >> >> I'm up for keeping it or making it stricter. But it needs to be >> enforced. So how do we get a dozen or so people to stop looking away >> every time someone is a dick in a thread? >> > Maybe the solution should be something that does not require all those > people to convene everytime there is some petty trolling going on > again. Yes.
> > There is a big difference between "not caring" and not wanting to get > involved with this on a daily basis, Correct. > even if you guys seem to throw > all of those into the same pile. Best regards, Thomas. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
