On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 05:50:25PM +0100, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: [...] > 1. Implement a formal CoC enforcement system. This has been mostly > copypasted > from VideoLAN's, and is meant as more of a blueprint. This will no > doubt > be controversial.
So as mentioned already in the thread, the main issue is having a police/justice entity. I would say it needs to be separate from the development team (to maintain a power separation). Since such profile doesn't seem to be exactly common in the open source world, maybe we could externalize it. Does such a service exist with reasonable prices? Could we use our funds for this? I understand this may sound far-fetched, but who knows. If such solution is not viable, we could fallback on the voting committee to elect/design a subgroup of itself (an odd number like 3 persons maybe?) to hold this moderation task for a period of 3 or 6 months, maybe 1 year. Then these members are automatically maintainer of the CoC for this period of time, and decide what to do with it. Just random thoughts, no hard opinion on it to be honest. Regards, -- Clément B.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
