On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 7:10 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnu...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's a greeting, a welcoming back. You know, you're with friends, you get > some money together, one of you goes to the store to grab a few beers, he > comes back, "Ah, and you're back, and you bought enough beers, great.". It > would be an attack if someone said "Ah, and you're back, and I see you > bought the worst flavored water they sold there and kept the change.". You > don't walk out with the beers as soon as you hear "Ah, and you're back" > because that someone attacked your personal choice last time you went to > the store and this time you made some effort to find something else for > them.
... What? This is either the most naive interpretation of events I have ever read, or it's disingenuous. iive has never been anything even approaching friendly to me, ever. It also ignores context entirely. >> That should put to rest an notion it was a friendly "welcome back". > > Sorry, still not seeing it as an attack. When you left, sure, but not when > you returned. We can agree to disagree. There's not much point in arguing over one specific event. This mail was not about clearing up a specific event, but a general problem. There's not much point in devolving into that. - Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
