On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 03:08, Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote:

> For the present discussion/question, I want to ignore the testable
> implications of computationalism on physical law, and instead focus on the
> following idea:
>
> "How can we know if a robot is conscious?"
>
> Let's say there are two brains, one biological and one an exact
> computational emulation, meaning exact functional equivalence. Then let's
> say we can exactly control sensory input and perfectly monitor motor
> control outputs between the two brains.
>
> Given that computationalism implies functional equivalence, then identical
> inputs yield identical internal behavior (nerve activations, etc.) and
> outputs, in terms of muscle movement, facial expressions, and speech.
>
> If we stimulate nerves in the person's back to cause pain, and ask them
> both to describe the pain, both will speak identical sentences. Both will
> say it hurts when asked, and if asked to write a paragraph describing the
> pain, will provide identical accounts.
>
> Does the definition of functional equivalence mean that any scientific
> objective third-person analysis or test is doomed to fail to find any
> distinction in behaviors, and thus necessarily fails in its ability to
> disprove consciousness in the functionally equivalent robot mind?
>
> Is computationalism as far as science can go on a theory of mind before it
> reaches this testing roadblock?
>

We can’t know if a particular entity is conscious, but we can know that if
it is conscious, then a functional equivalent, as you describe, is also
conscious. This is the subject of David Chalmers’ paper:

http://consc.net/papers/qualia.html


-- 
Stathis Papaioannou

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAH%3D2ypXRHEW6PSnb2Bj2vf1RbQ6CoLFzCoKAHxgJkXTsfg%3DWyw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to