On 5/26/2025 10:16 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Monday, May 26, 2025 at 11:07:03 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:



    On 5/26/2025 9:29 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


    On Monday, May 26, 2025 at 7:44:59 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:



        On 5/26/2025 2:51 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


        On Monday, May 26, 2025 at 5:57:36 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:

            On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 3:33 PM Alan Grayson
            <[email protected]> wrote:

                /> I'm disagreeing with anyone, including you, who
                thinks the EP is an absolute, when in fact it's a
                relative, an approximation./


            The Equivalence Principle, which is the foundation of
            General Relativity, states that at sufficiently small
            scales there is no way to tell the difference between a
            gravitational field and a simple acceleration. And it is
            not an approximation. But is it always correct? That is
            not certain because General Relativity does not take
            Quantum Mechanics into account, nevertheless so far at
            least the Equivalence Principle has easily passed every
            experimental test put to it.


        *Since the EP depends on measurement accuracy, it's
        mischaracterized as some absolute principle. That's pretty
        obvious regardless of contrary opinions, including
        Einstein's. AG
        *
        It was just an inspiring idea that Einstein had. It didn't
        need to have three digit accuracy.

        Brent


    *Sure, but inspiring how, in what way? No one seems able to put
    some beef on this. AG
    *
    He saw that gravity didn't need to be treated as a force, it could
    be treated as force-free motion in non-flat spacetime.  This
    explained why all objects, whatever the material, fall with the
    same acceleration, something already determined experimentally by
    Baron von Etvos.  It's sometimes referred to as inertial mass =
    gravitational mass.

    Brent


*Interesting, TY, but does GR explain the acceleration? AG*
I just wrote, "This explained why all objects, whatever the material, fall with the same acceleration,.."

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/3a3ff552-402b-4fd8-a608-7576a1fbcacb%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to