On Monday, May 26, 2025 at 4:11:37 PM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 5:55 PM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote: *> **Since the EP depends on measurement accuracy, it's mischaracterized as some absolute principle. * *What the hell?! Name one physical principle on any subject in which measurement accuracy was NOT an important factor in checking its correctness. * *While they're generally idealizations which depend on measurements for verification, the EP fails straight out in most cases, with accurate measurements. The EP depends on poor measurements, unlike the other cases. AG* *> That's pretty obvious regardless of contrary opinions, including Einstein's. AG * *I would be willing to bet money that there is no true fact about physics that is obvious to you that was not obvious to Albert Einstein. I could say the same thing about me, but unlike you I'm smart enough to know that I'm not smarter than Einstein. * *Did you know that Einstein believed in the aether -- but what aether was he a believer in? And he didn't believe in QM, and surely not Everett's interpretation, so you must be smarter than him. Moreover, and most important IMO, according to you and the AI, the EP was crucial in the development of GR, but neither have a clue, how. Too funny. AG* * John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/abf73574-4e6b-4bc4-af5c-b0ac65d6e5a7n%40googlegroups.com.
