On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 8:46 PM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:

*>> Name one physical principle on any subject in which measurement
> accuracy was NOT an important factor in checking its correctness. *
>
>
> *> While they're generally idealizations which depend on measurements for
> verification, the EP fails straight out in most cases, with accurate
> measurements. The EP depends on poor measurements, unlike the other cases.
> AG *
>

*I am unable to make any sense whatsoever out of the above word salad. *


*>>> That's pretty obvious regardless of contrary opinions, including
> Einstein's. AG *
>
>
> *>> I would be willing to bet money that there is no true fact about
> physics that is obvious to you that was not obvious to Albert Einstein. I
> could say the same thing about me, but unlike you I'm smart enough to know
> that I'm not smarter than Einstein.  *
>
>
> *> Did you know that Einstein believed in the aether*
>

*Einstein is the one who killed the idea of the aether in 1905 with his
paper on Special Relativity. And if you'd been around in 1879 when Einstein
was born would you have said it's "pretty obvious" the aether didn't exist?
I don't think so.*

*Incidentally 1905 was a very good year for Einstein, in that year he
published another paper on the Photoelectric Effect which was what earned
him the Nobel Prize. And still in 1905 Einstein wrote a paper that gave the
theoretical explanation for Brownian Motion and for the first time allowed
someone to calculate the size of atoms, and that finally convinced the last
holdouts that atoms were real. *

*And in 1917 Einstein used Quantum Mechanics to discover "Stimulated
Emission", the fundamental principle that allows the LASER to work, in fact
the word is an acronym that stands for Light Amplification by Stimulated
Emission of Radiation. **Even if Einstein had not said one word about
Special or General Relativity he would've still been considered one of the
greatest physicists of the 20th century, as it is the only one who made a
comparable contribution to physics would be Isaac Newton. They are in a
class by themselves. *


> * > he didn't believe in QM,*
>

*Bullshit. Einstein was one of the principal pioneers of Quantum Mechanics,
in fact that's what he got his Nobel prize in 1921 for, it was NOT for
Relativity. Einstein believed that Quantum Mechanics was true but
incomplete, and it may turn out he was right about that, he also thought
the Copenhagen interpretation was gibberish, and he was certainly right
about that.   *


> *> and surely not Everett's interpretation,*
>

*True, Einstein didn't believe in the Everett interpretation, but he didn't
disbelieve in the Everett interpretation either. That's because Everett
didn't come up with his interpretation until 1957. Einstein died in 1955. *

* > according to you and the AI, the EP was crucial in the development of
> GR,*
>

*According to Einstein too, he said he came up with the Equivalence
Principle in 1907 and it was the "happiest thought" of his life, although
it took him another 8 years of  grueling work to state that simple idea in
the language of non-Euclidean 4D tensor calculus.  He worked so hard on it
he lost 50 pounds and nearly died.  *

* John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis
<https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>*
d4c



>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv1j8XQ_rvHQFoj7i7q0h_CYObyO5nCxrzzm6bcFhQ5meA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to