* Eli Zaretskii <86zfhudmzc....@gnu.org> : Wrote on Sun, 09 Mar 2025 21:26:31 +0200: > You evidently have a very restricted notion of what is "new", which > seems to be specifically tailored to your goal of asserting that LLMs > and ML technology in general cannot produce anything that is > traditionally considered to be result of creative activities.
> You basically fire first, and draw the target around the hit point > later ^^^^ [snip] > (And no, ML and LLMs do not engage in combinatorial computations, they > solve problems differently, and that is why they succeed, because in > many cases the problems are NP-hard, so cannot be solved by dumb > exhaustive search of the solution space.) Aren't LLM solutions are produced in a similar way (i.e. produce a solution via "fire first" and then draw the target around the hit point and say this is the solution)? And in a world where LLM is implemented the end consumer (victim?) has no choice but to accept the solution (since the problem was intractable anyway). --- via emacs-tangents mailing list (https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-tangents)
