> From: Suhail Singh <suhailsingh...@gmail.com> > Cc: Suhail Singh <suhailsingh...@gmail.com>, Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org>, > arne_...@web.de, van...@sdf.org, emacs-tangents@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 10:37:48 -0400 > > Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> writes: > > > While people can strive to change definitions of words, in this case > > it is not subjective, rather objective definition. > > What is or isn't considered "innovation" is not objective. Even if the > term may be defined objectively in terms of characteristics such as > "new" or "novel", what those terms mean isn't objective.
I suggest to drop this. Jean Louis cannot be convinced to even consider changing his mind about this. He is locked on the idea which basically says that "innovation" is something that only humans can do, by definition. So any discovery or information produced by a program will always be immediately dismissed by him, as not being "innovation". Why? because it was produced by a program, that's why. It's useless to try to convince him. He will not change his mind, no matter what. Karl Popper and his concept of "religious disputes" comes to mind. Just drop this, it's a waste of time, energy, and bandwidth. --- via emacs-tangents mailing list (https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-tangents)
