I appreciate that you're relatively new to the DNS, but it really looks like you're repeatedly guessing about how the DNS works, and often guessing wrong.
How about backing up a few steps and checking your guesses, so you can make more useful proposals ? There's a lot of people who'd be happy to help if you'd just ask. >The SPF evolution might offer some instructive lessons in this regard: > 1. SPF began with a dedicated RR type (99) alongside TXT records No, it did not. The actual history is easily available if you'd just ask. > The history of TLSA (type 52) for DANE illustrates this journey: > - Though technically sound and RFC-standardized since 2012, TLSA still > has room to grow to reach the adoption it originally anticipated TLSA's lack of acceptance has very little to do with problems publishing TLSA records. It has far more to do with its depending on DNSSEC, and even more with the fact that the people who write web browsers have no interest in using it. The other TLSA application is for mail servers where there is a separate thing callled MTA-STS that was invented to avoid needing DNSSEC. Again, the history is easily available if you'd just ask. R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
