On 5 Oct 2015, at 17:16, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On 5 Oct 2015, at 17:00, Joe Abley wrote:
OK, I agree they are templates.
I disagree that it makes sense to publish URLs that refer to just the
key label used by the currently active KSK. That would make this
document inaccurate as soon as a KSK roll occurred, despite the fact
that it aims to document the way that the current and future
successor trust anchors are published.
It sounds like you don't want to limit the document to what many
people have asked, namely to document ICANN's current methods for
publishing the KSK. That's a fine desire, but it is quite sloppy to
conflate the two.
I think we've passed the point of diminishing returns on this point (if
not this thread).
My perspective remains that the document does exactly what you
characterise it as not doing. Perhaps it's time to sit back and wait for
others here to express an opinion.
The "key-label" token is intended to be taken from the
root-anchors.xml file, which is cited with a stable URL.
The term "key-label" does not appear in Section 2.1, so there is not
even a description of how to fill in the template.
That sounds like a change we could make that would aid clarity. Thanks
-- we'll review and see what we can do.
Joe
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
